Characterization of Marburg virus glycoprotein in viral entry.
Balaji Manicassamy1
Jizhen Wang
Emily Rumschlag
Stéphanie Tymen
Valentina Volchkova
Viktor Volchkov
Lijun Rong
Affiliations1 institutions
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine Research Building, University of Illinois at Chicago, 8133 COMRB, 909 S. Wolcott Ave., Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
One major determinant of host tropism for filoviruses is viral glycoprotein (GP), which is involved in receptor binding and viral entry. Compared to Ebola GP (EGP), Marburg GP (MGP) is less well characterized in viral entry. In this study, using a human immunodeficiency virus-based pseudotyped virus as a surrogate system, we have characterized the role of MGP in viral entry. We have shown that like EGP, the mucin-like region of MGP (289-501) is not essential for virus entry. We have developed a viral entry interference assay for filoviruses, and using this assay, we have demonstrated that transfection of EGP or MGP in target cells can interfere with EGP/HIV and MGP/HIV pseudotyped virus entry in a dose-dependent manner. These results are consistent with the notion that Ebola and Marburg viruses use the same or a related host molecule(s) for viral entry. Substitutions of the non-conserved residues in MGP1 did not impair MGP-mediated viral entry. Unlike that of EGP1, individual substitutions of many conserved residues of MGP1 exerted severe defects in MGP expression, incorporation to HIV virions, and thus its ability to mediate viral entry. These results indicate that MGP is more sensitive to substitutions of the conserved residues, suggesting that MGP may fold differently from EGP.
Substitutions of conserved residues in the Marburg virus glycoprotein impaired its folding, virion incorporation, and capacity for viral entry, highlighting molecular features underlying differences from Ebola virus GP.
Unlike that of EGP1, individual substitutions of many conserved residues of MGP1 exerted severe defects in MGP expression, incorporation to HIV virions, and thus its ability to mediate viral entry. These results indicate that MGP is more sensitive to substitutions of the conserved residues, suggesting that MGP may fold differently from EGP.
Genes or proteins
glycoprotein; MGP1
Mechanism types
receptor_binding; cell_entry; protein_folding
Receptor Usage1 records
Receptor UsageExtraction confidence 0.95
Key finding
Ebola and Marburg virus glycoproteins mediate receptor binding and use the same or related host molecule(s) for viral entry.
Compared to Ebola GP (EGP), Marburg GP (MGP) is less well characterized in viral entry. Using a human immunodeficiency virus-based pseudotyped virus, the study showed that transfection of EGP or MGP in target cells can interfere with EGP/HIV and MGP/HIV pseudotyped virus entry, suggesting that Ebola and Marburg viruses use the same or a related host molecule(s) for viral entry.