Literature detail

Flying-fox roost disturbance and Hendra virus spillover risk.

Daniel Edson1 Hume Field2,3 Lee McMichael2,4 David Jordan5 Nina Kung1 David Mayer6 Craig Smith1
Affiliations 6 institutions
  1. Queensland Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  2. Queensland Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  3. EcoHealth Alliance, New York, New York, United States of America.
  4. School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia.
  5. Department of Primary Industries, Wollongbar, New South Wales, Australia.
  6. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
PMID 26016629 2015 PLoS One eng epublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

Bats of the genus Pteropus (flying-foxes) are the natural host of Hendra virus (HeV) which periodically causes fatal disease in horses and humans in Australia. The increased urban presence of flying-foxes often provokes negative community sentiments because of reduced social amenity and concerns of HeV exposure risk, and has resulted in calls for the dispersal of urban flying-fox roosts. However, it has been hypothesised that disturbance of urban roosts may result in a stress-mediated increase in HeV infection in flying-foxes, and an increased spillover risk. We sought to examine the impact of roost modification and dispersal on HeV infection dynamics and cortisol concentration dynamics in flying-foxes. The data were analysed in generalised linear mixed models using restricted maximum likelihood (REML). The difference in mean HeV prevalence in samples collected before (4.9%), during (4.7%) and after (3.4%) roost disturbance was small and non-significant (P = 0.440). Similarly, the difference in mean urine specific gravity-corrected urinary cortisol concentrations was small and non-significant (before = 22.71 ng/mL, during = 27.17, after = 18.39) (P= 0.550). We did find an underlying association between cortisol concentration and season, and cortisol concentration and region, suggesting that other (plausibly biological or environmental) variables play a role in cortisol concentration dynamics. The effect of roost disturbance on cortisol concentration approached statistical significance for region, suggesting that the relationship is not fixed, and plausibly reflecting the nature and timing of disturbance. We also found a small positive statistical association between HeV excretion status and urinary cortisol concentration. Finally, we found that the level of flying-fox distress associated with roost disturbance reflected the nature and timing of the activity, highlighting the need for a 'best practice' approach to dispersal or roost modification activities. The findings usefully inform public discussion and policy development in relation to Hendra virus and flying-fox management.

Animals Australia Chiroptera Hendra Virus Henipavirus Infections Hydrocortisone Seasons

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

1 total
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.90
Key finding

Surveillance of flying-foxes for Hendra virus before, during, and after roost disturbance found no significant change in infection prevalence associated with disturbance.

Virus
Location
Supporting text

We sought to examine the impact of roost modification and dispersal on HeV infection dynamics and cortisol concentration dynamics in flying-foxes. The difference in mean HeV prevalence in samples collected before (4.9%), during (4.7%) and after (3.4%) roost disturbance was small and non-significant (P = 0.440).

Method
virus detection; epidemiological monitoring
Sample type
urine
Geographic raw
Australia
Country inferred
Australia