Literature detail

Distinct spread of DNA and RNA viruses among mammals amid prominent role of domestic species.

Konstans Wells1 Serge Morand2 Maya Wardeh3 Matthew Baylis3,4
Affiliations 4 institutions
  1. Department of Biosciences Swansea University Swansea UK.
  2. CIRAD ASTRE, CNRS ISEM, Faculty of Veterinary Technology Kasetsart University Bangkok Thailand.
  3. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health Institute of Infection and Global Health University of Liverpool Neston UK.
  4. Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections University of Liverpool UK.
PMID 32336945 2020 Glob Ecol Biogeogr eng ppublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

Emerging infectious diseases arising from pathogen spillover from mammals to humans constitute a substantial health threat. Tracing virus origin and predicting the most likely host species for future spillover events are major objectives in One Health disciplines.We assessed patterns of virus sharing among a large diversity of mammals, including humans and domestic species. Global. Current. Mammals and associated viruses. We used network centrality analysis and trait-based Bayesian hierarchical models to explore patterns of virus sharing among mammals. We analysed a global database that compiled the associations between 1,785 virus species and 725 mammalian host species as sourced from automatic screening of meta-data accompanying published nucleotide sequences between 1950 and 2019. We show that based on current evidence, domesticated mammals hold the most central positions in networks of known mammal-virus associations. Among entire host-virus networks, Carnivora and Chiroptera hold central positions for mainly sharing RNA viruses, whereas ungulates hold central positions for sharing both RNA and DNA viruses with other host species. We revealed strong evidence that DNA viruses were phylogenetically more host specific than RNA viruses. RNA viruses exhibited low functional host specificity despite an overall tendency to infect phylogenetically related species, signifying high potential to shift across hosts with different ecological niches. The frequencies of sharing viruses among hosts and the proportion of zoonotic viruses in hosts were larger for RNA than for DNA viruses. Acknowledging the role of domestic species in addition to host and virus traits in patterns of virus sharing is necessary to improve our understanding of virus spread and spillover in times of global change. Understanding multi-host virus-sharing pathways adds focus to curtail disease spread.

disease emergence disease risk assessment global virus spread host–parasite interaction network analysis pathogen spillover zoonotic disease risk

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

4 total
2 records
Extraction confidence 0.90
Key finding

Phylogenetic analysis based on nucleotide sequence metadata indicated that DNA viruses are more host specific than RNA viruses, which show higher capacity for host shifts among mammals.

Virus
Not specified
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We analysed a global database that compiled the associations between 1,785 virus species and 725 mammalian host species as sourced from automatic screening of meta-data accompanying published nucleotide sequences between 1950 and 2019. We revealed strong evidence that DNA viruses were phylogenetically more host specific than RNA viruses.

Analysis methods
phylogenetic analysis
Extraction confidence 0.90
Key finding

Phylogenetic analyses showed RNA viruses have lower host specificity and higher potential for cross-species transmission among mammals.

Virus
Not specified
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We revealed strong evidence that DNA viruses were phylogenetically more host specific than RNA viruses. RNA viruses exhibited low functional host specificity despite an overall tendency to infect phylogenetically related species, signifying high potential to shift across hosts.

Analysis methods
phylogenetic analysis
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

RNA and DNA viruses are frequently shared between different mammalian orders such as Carnivora, Chiroptera, and ungulates, demonstrating cross-species viral transmission among non-human mammals.

Virus
Not specified
Location
Supporting text

Carnivora and Chiroptera hold central positions for mainly sharing RNA viruses, whereas ungulates hold central positions for sharing both RNA and DNA viruses with other host species.

Method
network centrality analysis; trait-based Bayesian hierarchical models
Study design
phylogenetic analysis
Transmission direction
animal-to-animal
Geographic raw
Global
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.80
Key finding

A global database of mammalian hosts and viruses, derived from nucleotide sequence metadata, provided surveillance of 1,785 viruses across 725 mammalian species including domestic and wild mammals.

Virus
Not specified
Host
Location
Supporting text

We analysed a global database that compiled the associations between 1,785 virus species and 725 mammalian host species as sourced from automatic screening of meta-data accompanying published nucleotide sequences between 1950 and 2019.

Method
database analysis; automatic screening; meta-data analysis; network centrality analysis; Bayesian hierarchical modeling
Geographic raw
Global