Literature detail

Efficient reverse genetics reveals genetic determinants of budding and fusogenic differences between Nipah and Hendra viruses and enables real-time monitoring of viral spread in small animal models of henipavirus infection.

Tatyana Yun1 Arnold Park2 Terence E Hill1 Olivier Pernet3 Shannon M Beaty2 Terry L Juelich1 Jennifer K Smith1 Lihong Zhang1 Yao E Wang3 Frederic Vigant2 Junling Gao4 Ping Wu4 Benhur Lee5 Alexander N Freiberg6
Affiliations 6 institutions
  1. Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA Galveston National Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
  2. Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  3. Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  4. Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
  5. Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA [email protected] [email protected].
  6. Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA Galveston National Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA Institute for Human Infections and Immunity, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA [email protected] [email protected].
PMID 25392218 2015 J Virol eng ppublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

Nipah virus (NiV) and Hendra virus (HeV) are closely related henipaviruses of the Paramyxovirinae. Spillover from their fruit bat reservoirs can cause severe disease in humans and livestock. Despite their high sequence similarity, NiV and HeV exhibit apparent differences in receptor and tissue tropism, envelope-mediated fusogenicity, replicative fitness, and other pathophysiologic manifestations. To investigate the molecular basis for these differences, we first established a highly efficient reverse genetics system that increased rescue titers by ≥3 log units, which offset the difficulty of generating multiple recombinants under constraining biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) conditions. We then replaced, singly and in combination, the matrix (M), fusion (F), and attachment glycoprotein (G) genes in mCherry-expressing recombinant NiV (rNiV) with their HeV counterparts. These chimeric but isogenic rNiVs replicated well in primary human endothelial and neuronal cells, indicating efficient heterotypic complementation. The determinants of budding efficiency, fusogenicity, and replicative fitness were dissociable: HeV-M budded more efficiently than NiV-M, accounting for the higher replicative titers of HeV-M-bearing chimeras at early times, while the enhanced fusogenicity of NiV-G-bearing chimeras did not correlate with increased replicative fitness. Furthermore, to facilitate spatiotemporal studies on henipavirus pathogenesis, we generated a firefly luciferase-expressing NiV and monitored virus replication and spread in infected interferon alpha/beta receptor knockout mice via bioluminescence imaging. While intraperitoneal inoculation resulted in neuroinvasion following systemic spread and replication in the respiratory tract, intranasal inoculation resulted in confined spread to regions corresponding to olfactory bulbs and salivary glands before subsequent neuroinvasion. This optimized henipavirus reverse genetics system will facilitate future investigations into the growing numbers of novel henipavirus-like viruses. Nipah virus (NiV) and Hendra virus (HeV) are recently emergent zoonotic and highly lethal pathogens with pandemic potential. Although differences have been observed between NiV and HeV replication and pathogenesis, the molecular basis for these differences has not been examined. In this study, we established a highly efficient system to reverse engineer changes into replication-competent NiV and HeV, which facilitated the generation of reporter-expressing viruses and recombinant NiV-HeV chimeras with substitutions in the genes responsible for viral exit (the M gene, critical for assembly and budding) and viral entry (the G [attachment] and F [fusion] genes). These chimeras revealed differences in the budding and fusogenic properties of the M and G proteins, respectively, which help explain previously observed differences between NiV and HeV. Finally, to facilitate future in vivo studies, we monitored the replication and spread of a bioluminescent reporter-expressing NiV in susceptible mice; this is the first time such in vivo imaging has been performed under BSL-4 conditions.

Disease Models, Animal Virus Internalization Virus Release Animals Genetic Complementation Test Hendra Virus Henipavirus Infections Humans Mice, Knockout Nipah Virus Recombination, Genetic Reverse Genetics Viral Tropism

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

5 total
2 records
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

Recombinant Nipah viruses bearing Hendra virus genes replicated efficiently in primary human endothelial and neuronal cells, showing cross-species competency of viral components.

Virus
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Chimeric but isogenic rNiVs replicated well in primary human endothelial and neuronal cells, indicating efficient heterotypic complementation.

Method
reverse genetics; replication assay
Sample type
endothelial cells; neuronal cells
Experimental system
in vitro cell culture
Extraction confidence 0.90
Key finding

A bioluminescent recombinant Nipah virus replicated and spread in interferon alpha/beta receptor knockout mice, demonstrating in vivo host susceptibility and neuroinvasion routes.

Virus
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We generated a firefly luciferase-expressing NiV and monitored virus replication and spread in infected interferon alpha/beta receptor knockout mice via bioluminescence imaging.

Method
reverse genetics; bioluminescence imaging; experimental infection
Sample type
respiratory tract; olfactory bulbs; salivary glands
Experimental system
in vivo animal experiment
2 records
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

The matrix (M) and glycoprotein (G) genes of Hendra and Nipah viruses determine differences in budding efficiency, fusogenicity, and replicative fitness, revealing molecular adaptations underlying their distinct phenotypes.

Virus
Host
Not specified
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

HeV-M budded more efficiently than NiV-M, accounting for the higher replicative titers of HeV-M-bearing chimeras at early times, while the enhanced fusogenicity of NiV-G-bearing chimeras did not correlate with increased replicative fitness.

Genes or proteins
M; G
Mechanism types
budding_efficiency; fusogenicity; replication_efficiency
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

The matrix (M) and glycoprotein (G) genes of Nipah and Hendra viruses contribute distinct molecular properties affecting budding, fusogenicity, and replication fitness.

Virus
Host
Not specified
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

HeV-M budded more efficiently than NiV-M, accounting for the higher replicative titers of HeV-M-bearing chimeras at early times, while the enhanced fusogenicity of NiV-G-bearing chimeras did not correlate with increased replicative fitness.

Genes or proteins
M; G
Mechanism types
budding_efficiency; fusogenicity; replication_efficiency
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.80
Key finding

Chimeric Nipah-Hendra viruses demonstrated that the G attachment glycoprotein determines fusogenicity and receptor/tissue tropism differences between Nipah virus and Hendra virus.

Virus
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

The authors replaced, singly and in combination, the matrix (M), fusion (F), and attachment glycoprotein (G) genes in recombinant Nipah virus with their Hendra virus counterparts. These chimeric viruses revealed that differences in the G (attachment) glycoprotein explained differences in fusogenic properties and receptor/tissue tropism between Nipah and Hendra viruses.

Method
reverse genetics; recombinant virus assay
Receptors
attachment glycoprotein (G)