Literature detail

Evidence of exposure to henipaviruses in domestic pigs in Uganda.

Christine Atherstone1,2 Sandra Diederich3 Hana M Weingartl4 Kerstin Fischer3 Anne Balkema-Buschmann3 Delia Grace5 Silvia Alonso6 Navneet K Dhand1 Michael P Ward1 Siobhan M Mor1,7
Affiliations 7 institutions
  1. Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
  2. International Livestock Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
  3. Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute of Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany.
  4. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  5. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
  6. International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  7. Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
PMID 30576076 2019 Transbound Emerg Dis eng ppublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

Hendra virus (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV), belonging to the genus Henipavirus, are among the most pathogenic of viruses in humans. Old World fruit bats (family Pteropodidae) are the natural reservoir hosts. Molecular and serological studies found evidence of henipavirus infection in fruit bats from several African countries. However, little is known about the potential for spillover into domestic animals in East Africa, particularly pigs, which served as amplifying hosts during the first outbreak of NiV in Malaysia and Singapore. We collected sera from 661 pigs presented for slaughter in Uganda between December 2015 and October 2016. Using HeV G and NiV G indirect ELISAs, 14 pigs (2%) were seroreactive in at least one ELISA. Seroprevalence increased to 5.4% in October 2016, when pigs were 9.5 times more likely to be seroreactive than pigs sampled in December 2015 (p = 0.04). Eight of the 14 ELISA-positive samples reacted with HeV N antigen in Western blot. None of the sera neutralized HeV or NiV in plaque reduction neutralization tests. Although we did not detect neutralizing antibodies, our results suggest that pigs in Uganda are exposed to henipaviruses or henipa-like viruses. Pigs in this study were sourced from many farms throughout Uganda, suggesting multiple (albeit rare) introductions of henipaviruses into the pig population. We postulate that given the widespread distribution of Old World fruit bats in Africa, spillover of henipaviruses from fruit bats to pigs in Uganda could result in exposure of pigs at multiple locations. A higher risk of a spillover event at the end of the dry season might be explained by higher densities of bats and contact with pigs at this time of the year, exacerbated by nutritional stress in bat populations and their reproductive cycle. Future studies should prioritize determining the risk of spillover of henipaviruses from pigs to people, so that potential risks can be mitigated.

antibodies Hendra virus Henipavirus Nipah virus swine Uganda Animals Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Female Hendra Virus Henipavirus Infections Male Nipah Virus Prevalence Risk Factors Seroepidemiologic Studies Sus scrofa Swine

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

4 total
2 records
Extraction confidence 0.90
Key finding

Spillover of henipaviruses from fruit bats to pigs was postulated based on serological evidence of exposure among Ugandan pigs.

Virus
Location
Supporting text

We postulate that given the widespread distribution of Old World fruit bats in Africa, spillover of henipaviruses from fruit bats to pigs in Uganda could result in exposure of pigs at multiple locations.

Method
ELISA; Western blot; plaque reduction neutralization test
Study design
serological survey
Transmission direction
animal-to-human
Geographic raw
Uganda
Country inferred
Uganda
Extraction confidence 0.80
Key finding

The article highlights possible risk of henipavirus spillover from pigs to humans in Uganda and recommends studying this transmission direction.

Virus
Location
Supporting text

Future studies should prioritize determining the risk of spillover of henipaviruses from pigs to people, so that potential risks can be mitigated.

Transmission direction
animal-to-human
Geographic raw
Uganda
Country inferred
Uganda
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.98
Key finding

Domestic pigs in Uganda showed serological reactivity to henipaviruses in ELISA and Western blot assays, indicating exposure to henipaviruses or henipa-like viruses.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We collected sera from 661 pigs presented for slaughter in Uganda between December 2015 and October 2016. Using HeV G and NiV G indirect ELISAs, 14 pigs (2%) were seroreactive in at least one ELISA. Seroprevalence increased to 5.4% in October 2016... Eight of the 14 ELISA-positive samples reacted with HeV N antigen in Western blot. None of the sera neutralized HeV or NiV in plaque reduction neutralization tests. Although we did not detect neutralizing antibodies, our results suggest that pigs in Uganda are exposed to henipaviruses or henipa-like viruses.

Method
ELISA; Western blot; plaque reduction neutralization test
Sample type
sera
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.85
Key finding

Serological monitoring of domestic pigs in Uganda showed that a small proportion had antibodies reactive to Hendra and Nipah virus antigens, suggesting exposure to henipaviruses or related viruses.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

We collected sera from 661 pigs presented for slaughter in Uganda between December 2015 and October 2016. Using HeV G and NiV G indirect ELISAs, 14 pigs (2%) were seroreactive in at least one ELISA... Although we did not detect neutralizing antibodies, our results suggest that pigs in Uganda are exposed to henipaviruses or henipa-like viruses.

Method
ELISA; Western blot; plaque reduction neutralization test
Sample type
sera
Geographic raw
Uganda
Country inferred
Uganda