Evidence of exposure to henipaviruses in domestic pigs in Uganda.

Christine Atherstone1,2 Sandra Diederich3 Hana M Weingartl4 Kerstin Fischer3 Anne Balkema-Buschmann3 Delia Grace5 Silvia Alonso6 Navneet K Dhand1 Michael P Ward1 Siobhan M Mor1,7
Affiliations 7 institutions
  1. Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
  2. International Livestock Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
  3. Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute of Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany.
  4. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  5. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
  6. International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  7. Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Abstract

Hendra virus (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV), belonging to the genus Henipavirus, are among the most pathogenic of viruses in humans. Old World fruit bats (family Pteropodidae) are the natural reservoir hosts. Molecular and serological studies found evidence of henipavirus infection in fruit bats from several African countries. However, little is known about the potential for spillover into domestic animals in East Africa, particularly pigs, which served as amplifying hosts during the first outbreak of NiV in Malaysia and Singapore. We collected sera from 661 pigs presented for slaughter in Uganda between December 2015 and October 2016. Using HeV G and NiV G indirect ELISAs, 14 pigs (2%) were seroreactive in at least one ELISA. Seroprevalence increased to 5.4% in October 2016, when pigs were 9.5 times more likely to be seroreactive than pigs sampled in December 2015 (p = 0.04). Eight of the 14 ELISA-positive samples reacted with HeV N antigen in Western blot. None of the sera neutralized HeV or NiV in plaque reduction neutralization tests. Although we did not detect neutralizing antibodies, our results suggest that pigs in Uganda are exposed to henipaviruses or henipa-like viruses. Pigs in this study were sourced from many farms throughout Uganda, suggesting multiple (albeit rare) introductions of henipaviruses into the pig population. We postulate that given the widespread distribution of Old World fruit bats in Africa, spillover of henipaviruses from fruit bats to pigs in Uganda could result in exposure of pigs at multiple locations. A higher risk of a spillover event at the end of the dry season might be explained by higher densities of bats and contact with pigs at this time of the year, exacerbated by nutritional stress in bat populations and their reproductive cycle. Future studies should prioritize determining the risk of spillover of henipaviruses from pigs to people, so that potential risks can be mitigated.

Supporting text Virus Host Location
antibodies 18 Hendra virus 44 Henipavirus 30 Nipah virus 55 swine 267 Uganda 10 Animals 1948 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay 36 Female 289 Hendra Virus 39 Henipavirus Infections 65 Male 224 Nipah Virus 45 Prevalence 62 Risk Factors 34 Seroepidemiologic Studies 113 Sus scrofa 30 Swine 258 Swine Diseases 153 Uganda 10

Evidence records

3 total
Zoonotic Surveillance
3 records · 2 evidence types
Evidence type
2 records
OVE3178
Key finding

Serological testing detected antibodies reactive to Hendra virus and Nipah virus antigens in pigs from Uganda, indicating exposure to henipaviruses.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Using HeV G and NiV G indirect ELISAs, 14 pigs (2%) were seroreactive in at least one ELISA. Seroprevalence increased to 5.4% in October 2016, when pigs were 9.5 times more likely to be seroreactive than pigs sampled in December 2015 (p = 0.04). Eight of the 14 ELISA-positive samples reacted with HeV N antigen in Western blot.

Method
HeV G indirect ELISA | NiV G indirect ELISA | HeV N Western blot
Sample type
sera
OVE3180
Key finding

Authors postulate that henipaviruses may spill over from fruit bats to domestic pigs in Uganda, with increased risk at the end of the dry season due to higher bat densities and bat–pig contact.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

We postulate that given the widespread distribution of Old World fruit bats in Africa, spillover of henipaviruses from fruit bats to pigs in Uganda could result in exposure of pigs at multiple locations. A higher risk of a spillover event at the end of the dry season might be explained by higher densities of bats and contact with pigs at this time of the year.

Method
serological assays (ELISA, Western blot) | epidemiological inference
Evidence type
1 records
OVE3179
Key finding

Domestic pigs from multiple farms across Uganda showed rare but repeated introductions of henipaviruses, indicating ecological exposure patterns within pig populations.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

Pigs in this study were sourced from many farms throughout Uganda, suggesting multiple (albeit rare) introductions of henipaviruses into the pig population.

Method
serological survey using HeV G and NiV G indirect ELISAs | Western blot analysis
Sample type
pig sera
Geographic raw
Uganda
Country inferred
UGA