Literature detail

Ranking the risk of animal-to-human spillover for newly discovered viruses.

Zoë L Grange1,2 Tracey Goldstein3 Christine K Johnson3 Simon Anthony3,4,5,6 Kirsten Gilardi3 Peter Daszak4 Kevin J Olival4 Tammie O'Rourke7 Suzan Murray8 Sarah H Olson9 Eri Togami3 Gema Vidal3 Expert Panel PREDICT Consortium Jonna A K Mazet1,2 University of Edinburgh Epigroup members those who wish to remain anonymous
Affiliations 9 institutions
  1. One Health Institute and Karen C. Drayer Wildlife Health Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
  2. [email protected] [email protected].
  3. One Health Institute and Karen C. Drayer Wildlife Health Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
  4. EcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY 1001.
  5. Center for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032.
  6. Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032.
  7. Metabiota, Inc., Nanaimo, BC V9S 1G5, Canada.
  8. Global Health, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC 20008.
  9. Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, NY 10460.
PMID 33822740 2021 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A eng ppublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

The death toll and economic loss resulting from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic are stark reminders that we are vulnerable to zoonotic viral threats. Strategies are needed to identify and characterize animal viruses that pose the greatest risk of spillover and spread in humans and inform public health interventions. Using expert opinion and scientific evidence, we identified host, viral, and environmental risk factors contributing to zoonotic virus spillover and spread in humans. We then developed a risk ranking framework and interactive web tool, SpillOver, that estimates a risk score for wildlife-origin viruses, creating a comparative risk assessment of viruses with uncharacterized zoonotic spillover potential alongside those already known to be zoonotic. Using data from testing 509,721 samples from 74,635 animals as part of a virus discovery project and public records of virus detections around the world, we ranked the spillover potential of 887 wildlife viruses. Validating the risk assessment, the top 12 were known zoonotic viruses, including SARS-CoV-2. Several newly detected wildlife viruses ranked higher than known zoonotic viruses. Using a scientifically informed process, we capitalized on the recent wealth of virus discovery data to systematically identify and prioritize targets for investigation. The publicly accessible SpillOver platform can be used by policy makers and health scientists to inform research and public health interventions for prevention and rapid control of disease outbreaks. SpillOver is a living, interactive database that can be refined over time to continue to improve the quality and public availability of information on viral threats to human health.

disease ecology emerging infectious disease public health wildlife zoonotic virus Communicable Diseases, Emerging COVID-19 Pandemics SARS-CoV-2 Zoonoses Animals Humans

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

1 total
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

Extensive global surveillance tested over half a million samples from tens of thousands of animals to assess wildlife viruses with zoonotic spillover potential.

Virus
Not specified
Host
Location
Supporting text

Using data from testing 509,721 samples from 74,635 animals as part of a virus discovery project and public records of virus detections around the world, we ranked the spillover potential of 887 wildlife viruses.

Method
virus discovery project
Geographic raw
around the world