Norovirus inter-species transmission in an ex vivo model is dependent on virus internalization capacity.

Nele Villabruna1,2 Myra Hosmillo3 Ian Goodfellow3 Niklas Arnberg4,5,6 Juan Bárcena7 Silke Rautenschlein8 Benjamin Heidrich9 Andreas Beineke2 Gisa Gerold1,10
Affiliations 10 institutions
  1. Institute of Biochemistry and Research Centre for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses (RIZ), University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
  2. Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
  3. Division of Virology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
  4. Department of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
  5. Umeå Centre for Microbial Research (UCMR), Umeå, Sweden.
  6. The Laboratory for Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden (MIMS), Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
  7. Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA/CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
  8. Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
  9. Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology Infectious Diseases and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  10. Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Active Last checked 2026-09-29 03:30:36 Source: NCBI PubMed

Abstract

Human noroviruses (HuNoV) are the most common cause of viral gastroenteritis worldwide, causing sporadic cases and outbreaks. Noroviruses that infect wild and domestic animals, including pigs and dogs, are genetically related to human noroviruses, increasing the potential for cross-species transmission. To investigate the potential of noroviruses to cross the species barrier, we used porcine, canine, and avian precision-cut intestinal slices. We show that human norovirus virus-like particles (VLPs) bind to pig and dog intestinal tissue and are taken up with a similar efficiency as the porcine and canine noroviruses, respectively. In contrast, no binding or internalization of human, porcine, or canine noroviruses was detected in chicken tissue. We further showed that human norovirus replicates in pig intestinal tissue. In contrast, while animal noroviruses attached to human intestinal cells, intracellular uptake was limited. This suggests that human-to-animal transmission is more likely than animal-to-human transmission and that viral uptake likely presents a species barrier.

Supporting text Virus Host Location
canine 11 ex vivo model 1 norovirus (NoV) 1 porcine 5 precision-cut intestinal slices 1 virus entry 11 virus-like particles (VLPs) 1 zoonotic potential 17

Evidence records

4 total
Experimental Infection
4 records · 1 evidence types
Evidence type
4 records
OVE11942
Key finding

Human norovirus VLPs bind to and are taken up by pig and dog intestinal tissue at efficiencies comparable to porcine and canine noroviruses.

Virus
Host
Experimental system Experimental system
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We show that human norovirus virus-like particles (VLPs) bind to pig and dog intestinal tissue and are taken up with a similar efficiency as the porcine and canine noroviruses, respectively.

Method
virus-like particle binding assay | tissue uptake/internalization assay | ex vivo tissue culture of porcine and canine intestinal slices
Sample type
precision-cut intestinal slices
Experimental system
ex vivo precision-cut intestinal slice model
OVE11943
Key finding

Human, porcine, and canine noroviruses showed no binding or internalization in chicken intestinal tissue.

Virus
Host
Experimental system
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

In contrast, no binding or internalization of human, porcine, or canine noroviruses was detected in chicken tissue.

Method
binding assay | internalization assay | ex vivo tissue culture of avian intestinal slices
Sample type
precision-cut intestinal slices
Experimental system
ex vivo precision-cut intestinal slice model
OVE11944
Key finding

Human norovirus replicates in pig intestinal tissue in the ex vivo model.

Virus
Host
Experimental system
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We further showed that human norovirus replicates in pig intestinal tissue.

Method
ex vivo infection of porcine intestinal slices | viral replication assessment
Sample type
precision-cut intestinal slices
Experimental system
ex vivo precision-cut intestinal slice model
OVE11945
Key finding

Animal noroviruses attach to human intestinal cells but show limited intracellular uptake.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

In contrast, while animal noroviruses attached to human intestinal cells, intracellular uptake was limited.

Method
virus attachment assay | internalization assay
Experimental system
cell-culture system with human intestinal cells