Effects of human anti-spike protein receptor binding domain antibodies on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus neutralization escape and fitness.

Jianhua Sui1,2 Meagan Deming3 Barry Rockx3 Robert C Liddington4 Quan Karen Zhu1,2 Ralph S Baric5 Wayne A Marasco1,6
Affiliations 6 institutions
  1. Department of Cancer Immunology and AIDS, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  2. Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA.
  3. Departments of Epidemiology and Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  4. Infectious and Inflammatory Disease Center, Stanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
  5. Departments of Epidemiology and Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA [email protected] [email protected].
  6. Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA [email protected] [email protected].

Abstract

The receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) glycoprotein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is a major target of protective immunity in vivo. Although a large number of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) have been developed, it remains unclear if a single RBD-targeting nAb or two in combination can prevent neutralization escape and, if not, attenuate viral virulence in vivo. In this study, we used a large panel of human nAbs against an epitope that overlaps the interface between the RBD and its receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), to assess their cross-neutralization activities against a panel of human and zoonotic SARS-CoVs and neutralization escape mutants. We also investigated the neutralization escape profiles of these nAbs and evaluated their effects on receptor binding and virus fitness in vitro and in mice. We found that some nAbs had great potency and breadth in neutralizing multiple viral strains, including neutralization escape viruses derived from other nAbs; however, no single nAb or combination of two blocked neutralization escape. Interestingly, in mice the neutralization escape mutant viruses showed either attenuation (Urbani background) or increased virulence (GD03 background) consistent with the different binding affinities between their RBDs and the mouse ACE2. We conclude that using either single nAbs or dual nAb combinations to target a SARS-CoV RBD epitope that shows plasticity may have limitations for preventing neutralization escape during in vivo immunotherapy. However, RBD-directed nAbs may be useful for providing broad neutralization and prevention of escape variants when combined with other nAbs that target a second conserved epitope with less plasticity and more structural constraint. The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in 2002 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012 has resulted in severe human respiratory disease with high death rates. Their zoonotic origins highlight the likelihood of reemergence or further evolution into novel human coronavirus pathogens. Broadly neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) that prevent infection of related viruses represent an important immunostrategy for combating coronavirus infections; however, for this strategy to succeed, it is essential to uncover nAb-mediated escape pathways and to pioneer strategies that prevent escape. Here, we used SARS-CoV as a research model and examined the escape pathways of broad nAbs that target the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the virus. We found that neither single nAbs nor two nAbs in combination blocked escape. Our results suggest that targeting conserved regions with less plasticity and more structural constraint rather than the SARS-CoV RBD-like region(s) should have broader utility for antibody-based immunotherapy.

Supporting text Virus Host Location
Neutralization Tests 31 Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 177 Animals 1948 Antibodies, Viral 212 Female 289 Humans 1440 Immune Evasion 25 Mice 253 Mice, Inbred BALB C 73 Mutation 209 Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A 57 Receptors, Virus 204 Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 78 Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus 274 Virulence 108 ACE2 protein, human 87 Ace2 protein, mouse 16

Evidence records

1 total
Functional Mechanism
1 records · 1 evidence types
Evidence type
1 records
OVE1846
Key finding

SARS-CoV rapidly generated neutralization escape mutants under single or dual RBD-targeting antibody pressure, demonstrating molecular adaptation for immune escape.

Virus
Host
Not specified
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We found that some nAbs had great potency and breadth in neutralizing multiple viral strains, including neutralization escape viruses derived from other nAbs; however, no single nAb or combination of two blocked neutralization escape.

Genes or proteins
spike | receptor binding domain | RBD
Receptors
ACE2
Mechanism types
immune escape