Literature detail

A quantitative and kinetic fusion protein-triggering assay can discern distinct steps in the nipah virus membrane fusion cascade.

Hector C Aguilar1 Vanessa Aspericueta Lindsey R Robinson Karen E Aanensen Benhur Lee
Affiliations 1 institutions
  1. Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA. [email protected]
PMID 20519383 2010 J Virol eng ppublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

The deadly paramyxovirus Nipah virus (NiV) contains a fusion glycoprotein (F) with canonical structural and functional features common to its class. Receptor binding to the NiV attachment glycoprotein (G) triggers F to undergo a two-phase conformational cascade: the first phase progresses from a metastable prefusion state to a prehairpin intermediate (PHI), while the second phase is marked by transition from the PHI to the six-helix-bundle hairpin. The PHI can be captured with peptides that mimic F's heptad repeat regions, and here we utilized a NiV heptad repeat peptide to quantify PHI formation and the half-lives (t(1/2)) of the first and second fusion cascade phases. We found that ephrinB2 receptor binding to G triggered approximately 2-fold more F than that triggered by ephrinB3, consistent with the increased rate and extent of fusion observed with ephrinB2- versus ephrinB3-expressing cells. In addition, for a series of hyper- and hypofusogenic F mutants, we quantified F-triggering capacities and measured the kinetics of their fusion cascade phases. Hyper- and hypofusogenicity can each be manifested through distinct stages of the fusion cascade, giving rise to vastly different half-lives for the first (t(1/2), 1.9 to 7.5 min) or second (t(1/2), 1.5 to 15.6 min) phase. While three mutants had a shorter first phase and a longer second phase than the wild-type protein, one mutant had the opposite phenotype. Thus, our results reveal multiple critical parameters that govern the paramyxovirus fusion cascade, and our assays should help efforts to elucidate other class I membrane fusion processes.

Virus Internalization Animals Cell Line Cricetinae Cricetulus Humans Kinetics Models, Biological Nipah Virus Protein Binding Protein Conformation Receptor, EphB2 Receptor, EphB3 Receptors, Virus Swine Viral Envelope Proteins attachment protein G F protein, Nipah virus

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

4 total
2 records
Extraction confidence 0.80
Key finding

EphrinB2 binding induces stronger activation of Nipah virus F glycoprotein than ephrinB3, leading to enhanced membrane fusion kinetics and efficiency.

Virus
Host
Not specified
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We found that ephrinB2 receptor binding to G triggered approximately 2-fold more F than that triggered by ephrinB3, consistent with the increased rate and extent of fusion observed with ephrinB2- versus ephrinB3-expressing cells.

Genes or proteins
G; F
Receptors
ephrinB2; ephrinB3
Mechanism types
receptor_binding; cell_entry; fusion_efficiency
Extraction confidence 0.80
Key finding

Mutations in the Nipah virus F glycoprotein generate hyper- or hypofusogenic phenotypes by altering kinetics of different steps in the fusion cascade.

Virus
Host
Not specified
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

In addition, for a series of hyper- and hypofusogenic F mutants, we quantified F-triggering capacities and measured the kinetics of their fusion cascade phases. Hyper- and hypofusogenicity can each be manifested through distinct stages of the fusion cascade.

Genes or proteins
F
Mechanism types
fusion_efficiency; protein_conformation; pathogenicity
2 records
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

EphrinB2 binding to the Nipah virus G glycoprotein activates the F fusion protein more efficiently than ephrinB3 binding, indicating receptor-specific differences in cell entry and membrane fusion.

Virus
Host
Not specified
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We found that ephrinB2 receptor binding to G triggered approximately 2-fold more F than that triggered by ephrinB3, consistent with the increased rate and extent of fusion observed with ephrinB2- versus ephrinB3-expressing cells.

Method
fusion protein-triggering assay
Receptors
ephrinB2
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

EphrinB3 binding to the Nipah virus G glycoprotein triggers less activation of the fusion protein compared to ephrinB2, showing receptor-specific efficiency differences in viral fusion.

Virus
Host
Not specified
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We found that ephrinB2 receptor binding to G triggered approximately 2-fold more F than that triggered by ephrinB3, consistent with the increased rate and extent of fusion observed with ephrinB2- versus ephrinB3-expressing cells.

Method
fusion protein-triggering assay
Receptors
ephrinB3