A quantitative and kinetic fusion protein-triggering assay can discern distinct steps in the nipah virus membrane fusion cascade.

Hector C Aguilar1 Vanessa Aspericueta Lindsey R Robinson Karen E Aanensen Benhur Lee
Affiliations 1 institutions
  1. Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA. [email protected]

Abstract

The deadly paramyxovirus Nipah virus (NiV) contains a fusion glycoprotein (F) with canonical structural and functional features common to its class. Receptor binding to the NiV attachment glycoprotein (G) triggers F to undergo a two-phase conformational cascade: the first phase progresses from a metastable prefusion state to a prehairpin intermediate (PHI), while the second phase is marked by transition from the PHI to the six-helix-bundle hairpin. The PHI can be captured with peptides that mimic F's heptad repeat regions, and here we utilized a NiV heptad repeat peptide to quantify PHI formation and the half-lives (t(1/2)) of the first and second fusion cascade phases. We found that ephrinB2 receptor binding to G triggered approximately 2-fold more F than that triggered by ephrinB3, consistent with the increased rate and extent of fusion observed with ephrinB2- versus ephrinB3-expressing cells. In addition, for a series of hyper- and hypofusogenic F mutants, we quantified F-triggering capacities and measured the kinetics of their fusion cascade phases. Hyper- and hypofusogenicity can each be manifested through distinct stages of the fusion cascade, giving rise to vastly different half-lives for the first (t(1/2), 1.9 to 7.5 min) or second (t(1/2), 1.5 to 15.6 min) phase. While three mutants had a shorter first phase and a longer second phase than the wild-type protein, one mutant had the opposite phenotype. Thus, our results reveal multiple critical parameters that govern the paramyxovirus fusion cascade, and our assays should help efforts to elucidate other class I membrane fusion processes.

Supporting text Virus Host Location
Virus Internalization 100 Animals 1948 Cell Line 158 Cricetinae 41 Cricetulus 7 Humans 1440 Kinetics 8 Models, Biological 16 Nipah Virus 45 Protein Binding 193 Protein Conformation 44 Receptor, EphB2 1 Receptor, EphB3 1 Receptors, Virus 204 Swine 258 Viral Envelope Proteins 60 attachment protein G 8 F protein, Nipah virus 2

Evidence records

1 total
Functional Mechanism
1 records · 1 evidence types
Evidence type
1 records
OVE815
Key finding

EphrinB2 acts as a more efficient receptor for Nipah virus G-mediated fusion than ephrinB3, triggering roughly twice as much fusion protein activation.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We found that ephrinB2 receptor binding to G triggered approximately 2-fold more F than that triggered by ephrinB3, consistent with the increased rate and extent of fusion observed with ephrinB2- versus ephrinB3-expressing cells.

Method
fusion assay | receptor binding comparison
Receptors
ephrinB2 | ephrinB3