Literature detail

Detection of potentially novel paramyxovirus and coronavirus viral RNA in bats and rats in the Mekong Delta region of southern Viet Nam.

A Berto1 P H Anh1 J J Carrique-Mas1,2 P Simmonds3 N Van Cuong1 N T Tue1 N Van Dung3 M E Woolhouse4 I Smith5 G A Marsh5 J E Bryant1,2 G E Thwaites1,2 S Baker1,2,6 M A Rabaa1,2 VIZIONS consortium
Affiliations 6 institutions
  1. Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
  2. Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
  3. Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  4. Centre for Immunity, Infection & Evolution, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  5. Health and Biosecurity, CSIRO, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Vic., Australia.
  6. The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
PMID 28418192 2018 Zoonoses Public Health eng ppublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

Bats and rodents are being increasingly recognized as reservoirs of emerging zoonotic viruses. Various studies have investigated bat viruses in tropical regions, but to date there are no data regarding viruses with zoonotic potential that circulate in bat and rat populations in Viet Nam. To address this paucity of data, we sampled three bat farms and three wet markets trading in rat meat in the Mekong Delta region of southern Viet Nam. Faecal and urine samples were screened for the presence of RNA from paramyxoviruses, coronaviruses and filoviruses. Paramyxovirus RNA was detected in 4 of 248 (1%) and 11 of 222 (4.9%) bat faecal and urine samples, respectively. Coronavirus RNA was detected in 55 of 248 (22%) of bat faecal samples; filovirus RNA was not detected in any of the bat samples. Further, coronavirus RNA was detected in 12 of 270 (4.4%) of rat faecal samples; all samples tested negative for paramyxovirus. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the bat paramyxoviruses and bat and rat coronaviruses were related to viruses circulating in bat and rodent populations globally, but showed no cross-species mixing of viruses between bat and rat populations within Viet Nam. Our study shows that potentially novel variants of paramyxoviruses and coronaviruses commonly circulate in bat and rat populations in Viet Nam. Further characterization of the viruses and additional human and animal surveillance is required to evaluate the likelihood of viral spillover and to assess whether these viruses pose a risk to human health.

bats coronavirus paramyxovirus rats Viet Nam zoonotic viruses Animals Chiroptera Coronavirus Feces Filoviridae Humans Paramyxoviridae Phylogeny Rats RNA, Viral Urine Vietnam

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

7 total
3 records
Extraction confidence 0.80
Key finding

Phylogenetic analysis showed that bat and rat coronaviruses in Viet Nam were related to globally circulating viruses but displayed no evidence of cross-species viral exchange between bats and rats.

Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the bat paramyxoviruses and bat and rat coronaviruses were related to viruses circulating in bat and rodent populations globally, but showed no cross-species mixing of viruses between bat and rat populations within Viet Nam.

Analysis methods
phylogenetic analysis
Extraction confidence 0.80
Key finding

Phylogenetic analysis showed that bat paramyxoviruses from Viet Nam were related to globally circulating bat paramyxoviruses without evidence of cross-species exchange with rats.

Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the bat paramyxoviruses and bat and rat coronaviruses were related to viruses circulating in bat and rodent populations globally, but showed no cross-species mixing of viruses between bat and rat populations within Viet Nam.

Analysis methods
phylogenetic analysis
Extraction confidence 0.80
Key finding

Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that rat coronaviruses in Viet Nam cluster with globally circulating rodent coronaviruses and show no phylogenetic evidence of cross-species mixing with bat viruses.

Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the bat paramyxoviruses and bat and rat coronaviruses were related to viruses circulating in bat and rodent populations globally, but showed no cross-species mixing of viruses between bat and rat populations within Viet Nam.

Analysis methods
phylogenetic analysis
2 records
Extraction confidence 0.90
Key finding

Bats from the Mekong Delta region of Viet Nam were found to harbor paramyxovirus and coronavirus RNA, suggesting they act as natural reservoirs for these viruses.

Host
Location
Supporting text

Faecal and urine samples were screened for the presence of RNA from paramyxoviruses, coronaviruses and filoviruses. Paramyxovirus RNA was detected in 4 of 248 (1%) and 11 of 222 (4.9%) bat faecal and urine samples, respectively. Coronavirus RNA was detected in 55 of 248 (22%) of bat faecal samples; filovirus RNA was not detected in any of the bat samples.

Method
field sampling; RNA screening
Sample type
faecal samples; urine samples
Geographic raw
Mekong Delta region of southern Viet Nam
Country inferred
Viet Nam
Extraction confidence 0.90
Key finding

Rat populations in Viet Nam’s Mekong Delta carried coronavirus RNA, supporting their role as local reservoirs.

Host
Location
Supporting text

Further, coronavirus RNA was detected in 12 of 270 (4.4%) of rat faecal samples; all samples tested negative for paramyxovirus.

Method
field sampling; RNA screening
Sample type
faecal samples
Geographic raw
Mekong Delta region of southern Viet Nam
Country inferred
Viet Nam
2 records
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

Paramyxovirus and coronavirus RNA were detected during surveillance of bat fecal and urine samples in southern Viet Nam.

Host
Location
Supporting text

Faecal and urine samples were screened for the presence of RNA from paramyxoviruses, coronaviruses and filoviruses. Paramyxovirus RNA was detected in 4 of 248 (1%) and 11 of 222 (4.9%) bat faecal and urine samples, respectively. Coronavirus RNA was detected in 55 of 248 (22%) of bat faecal samples.

Method
screening for viral RNA; phylogenetic analysis
Sample type
feces; urine
Geographic raw
Mekong Delta region of southern Viet Nam
Country inferred
Vietnam
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

Coronavirus RNA was detected through faecal sample surveillance in rats from southern Viet Nam.

Host
Location
Supporting text

Further, coronavirus RNA was detected in 12 of 270 (4.4%) of rat faecal samples; all samples tested negative for paramyxovirus.

Method
screening for viral RNA; phylogenetic analysis
Sample type
feces
Geographic raw
Mekong Delta region of southern Viet Nam
Country inferred
Vietnam