Literature detail

Predictive Value of Precision-Cut Lung Slices for the Susceptibility of Three Animal Species for SARS-CoV-2 and Validation in a Refined Hamster Model.

Nora M Gerhards1 Jan B W J Cornelissen1 Lucien J M van Keulen1 José Harders-Westerveen1 Rianka Vloet1 Bregtje Smid1 Stéphanie Vastenhouw1 Sophie van Oort1 Renate W Hakze-van der Honing1 Jose L Gonzales1 Norbert Stockhofe-Zurwieden1 Rineke de Jong1 Wim H M van der Poel1 Sandra Vreman1 Jeroen Kortekaas1,2 Paul J Wichgers Schreur1 Nadia Oreshkova1
Affiliations 2 institutions
  1. Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.
  2. Laboratory of Virology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
PMID 34209230 2021 Pathogens eng epublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

In assessing species susceptibility for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and in the search for an appropriate animal model, multiple research groups around the world inoculated a broad range of animal species using various SARS-CoV-2 strains, doses and administration routes. Although in silico analyses based on receptor binding and diverse in vitro cell cultures were valuable, exact prediction of species susceptibility based on these tools proved challenging. Here, we assessed whether precision-cut lung slices (PCLS) could facilitate the selection of animal models, thereby reducing animal experimentation. Pig, hamster and cat PCLS were incubated with SARS-CoV-2 and virus replication was followed over time. Virus replicated efficiently in PCLS from hamsters and cats, while no evidence of replication was obtained for pig PCLS. These data corroborate the findings of many research groups that have investigated the susceptibility of hamsters, pigs and cats towards infection with SARS-CoV-2. Our findings suggest that PCLS can be used as convenient tool for the screening of different animal species for sensitivity to newly emerged viruses. To validate our results obtained in PCLS, we employed the hamster model. Hamsters were inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 via the intranasal route. Susceptibility to infection was evaluated by body weight loss, viral loads in oropharyngeal swabs and respiratory tissues and lung pathology. The broadly used hamster model was further refined by including activity tracking of the hamsters by an activity wheel as a very robust and sensitive parameter for clinical health. In addition, to facilitate the quantification of pathology in the lungs, we devised a semi-quantitative scoring system for evaluating the degree of histological changes in the lungs. The inclusion of these additional parameters refined and enriched the hamster model, allowing for the generation of more data from a single experiment.

activity hamster model histology scores precision-cut lung slices SARS-CoV-2

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

4 total
4 records
Extraction confidence 0.98
Key finding

SARS-CoV-2 replicated in hamster and cat lung slices but not in pig lung slices.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Pig, hamster and cat precision-cut lung slices were incubated with SARS-CoV-2 and virus replication was followed over time. Virus replicated efficiently in PCLS from hamsters and cats, while no evidence of replication was obtained for pig PCLS.

Method
virus incubation; replication assay
Sample type
lung slices
Experimental system
ex vivo
Extraction confidence 0.98
Key finding

SARS-CoV-2 replicated in cat lung slices ex vivo.

Virus
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Pig, hamster and cat precision-cut lung slices were incubated with SARS-CoV-2 and virus replication was followed over time. Virus replicated efficiently in PCLS from hamsters and cats, while no evidence of replication was obtained for pig PCLS.

Method
virus incubation; replication assay
Sample type
lung slices
Experimental system
ex vivo
Extraction confidence 0.98
Key finding

No replication of SARS-CoV-2 was observed in pig lung slices ex vivo.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Pig, hamster and cat precision-cut lung slices were incubated with SARS-CoV-2 and virus replication was followed over time. Virus replicated efficiently in PCLS from hamsters and cats, while no evidence of replication was obtained for pig PCLS.

Method
virus incubation; replication assay
Sample type
lung slices
Experimental system
ex vivo
Extraction confidence 0.98
Key finding

In vivo infection of hamsters with SARS-CoV-2 via the intranasal route confirmed susceptibility with measurable viral loads and lung pathology.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

To validate our results obtained in PCLS, we employed the hamster model. Hamsters were inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 via the intranasal route. Susceptibility to infection was evaluated by body weight loss, viral loads in oropharyngeal swabs and respiratory tissues and lung pathology.

Method
experimental infection; intranasal inoculation; viral load measurement; pathology assessment
Sample type
oropharyngeal swabs; respiratory tissues; lungs
Experimental system
in vivo animal experiment