Literature detail

SARS-CoV-2 infections among animals in US zoological institutions resulted primarily from human-to-animal transmission without evidence of sustained evolution in animals (2020-2023).

Dominic J Cristiano1 Kate E Varela2 Chelsea E Anderson3 Lara Croft4 Erika Crook5 Chris Hanley6 Randall Junge7 Domini Montgomery6 Kristi Newland8 Sam Rivera9 Justin F Rosenberg10 Diana Worden11 Jill Yoshicedo12 Sam Young13 Molly Baker14 Monica Beddo14 Michelle Carruthers15 Amanda Feldpausch16 Heather Oltjen17 Deepanker Tewari18 Steven I Rekant19 Seana Cleary1 Chaney C Kalinich1 Amanda Liew1 Casey Barton Behravesh1 Ria R Ghai1 SARS-CoV-2 Zoos and Aquariums Working Group
Affiliations 19 institutions
  1. 1One Health Office, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, GA.
  2. 2Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Outbreak Response and Prevention Branch, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, GA.
  3. 3Georgia Aquarium, Atlanta, GA.
  4. 4Denver Zoo, Denver, CO.
  5. 5Utah's Hogle Zoo, Salt Lake City, UT.
  6. 6Saint Louis Zoo, Saint Louis, MO.
  7. 7Columbus Zoo and Aquarium, Powell, OH.
  8. 8Lee Richardson Zoo, Garden City, KS.
  9. 9Zoo Atlanta, Atlanta, GA.
  10. 10Pittsburgh Zoo and Aquarium, Pittsburgh, PA.
  11. 11Dallas Zoo, Dallas, TX.
  12. 12Honolulu Zoo, Honolulu, HI.
  13. 13Greensboro Science Center, Greensboro, NC.
  14. 14Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Jefferson City, MO.
  15. 15Dallas County Health and Human Services, Dallas, TX.
  16. 16Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, GA.
  17. 17Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Salt Lake City, UT.
  18. 18Pennsylvania Veterinary Laboratory, Harrisburg, PA.
  19. 19Veterinary Services, APHIS, USDA, Beltsville, MD.
PMID 41880766 2026 J Am Vet Med Assoc eng aheadofprint
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

We conducted a retrospective observational study to investigate exposure history, clinical signs, and onward transmission of animals infected with SARS-CoV-2 in US zoological institutions. We analyzed animal surveillance data collected through voluntary national surveillance during 2020 to 2023, including a descriptive epidemiologic analysis of surveillance data, comparative genomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 sequences from zoo animals and the US human population, and comparison of impacts at the human-animal interface for a subset of zoological institutions (n = 12) with a SARS-CoV-2 animal outbreak. During 2020 to 2023, 170 animals in zoological institutions were confirmed positive for SARS-CoV-2. These animals consisted of 13 species in 28 US jurisdictions. Of affected animals, 72.4% presented with clinical signs, most commonly cough (60.0%). The likely source of SARS-CoV-2 in animals was a known infected caretaker in 44.7% of cases. Some zoological institutions participated in an in-depth analysis of outbreaks; these institutions implemented an average of 48.7 and 52.9 of 88 recommended biosecurity practices in the month before and after an outbreak, respectively, in their facility. Zoological institutions were a high-risk setting for SARS-CoV-2 transmission via spill-back from people to animals. Genomic analysis supported that zoo animals became infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants circulating in humans at the time, with no evidence of significant viral evolution in zoo populations. Mitigating emerging infectious disease threats in these facilities is critical for protecting vulnerable animal populations and public health.

biosecurity captive wildlife SARS-CoV-2 zoonotic disease zoos

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

4 total
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.85
Key finding

Comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses indicated that SARS-CoV-2 infections in zoo animals originated from human variants, with no sustained viral evolution detected in these animal populations.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We analyzed ... comparative genomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 sequences from zoo animals and the US human population ... Genomic analysis supported that zoo animals became infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants circulating in humans at the time, with no evidence of significant viral evolution in zoo populations.

Genes or proteins
whole genome
Analysis methods
comparative genomic analysis; genomic analysis
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.80
Key finding

Confirmed human-to-animal SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks occurred among zoo animals in the United States between 2020 and 2023, with caretakers identified as the main exposure source.

Virus
Location
Supporting text

During 2020 to 2023, 170 animals in zoological institutions were confirmed positive for SARS-CoV-2. The likely source of SARS-CoV-2 in animals was a known infected caretaker in 44.7% of cases. Some zoological institutions participated in an in-depth analysis of outbreaks.

Method
retrospective observational study; epidemiologic analysis; genomic analysis; surveillance
Transmission direction
human-to-animal
Geographic raw
US
Country inferred
United States
Outbreak setting
zoological institutions
Outbreak time
2020 to 2023
Outbreak scale
170 animals confirmed positive; 13 species in 28 US jurisdictions
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

SARS-CoV-2 spread from infected human caretakers to animals in US zoos, representing confirmed human-to-animal spillback events.

Virus
Location
Supporting text

The likely source of SARS-CoV-2 in animals was a known infected caretaker in 44.7% of cases. Zoological institutions were a high-risk setting for SARS-CoV-2 transmission via spill-back from people to animals.

Method
genomic analysis; epidemiologic analysis
Study design
field surveillance
Transmission direction
human-to-animal
Geographic raw
US zoological institutions
Country inferred
United States
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.90
Key finding

Animal surveillance data from US zoos confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections in captive wildlife as part of national monitoring between 2020 and 2023.

Virus
Host
Not specified
Location
Supporting text

We analyzed animal surveillance data collected through voluntary national surveillance during 2020 to 2023, including a descriptive epidemiologic analysis of surveillance data, comparative genomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 sequences from zoo animals and the US human population.

Method
descriptive epidemiologic analysis; comparative genomic analysis; surveillance
Geographic raw
US zoological institutions
Country inferred
United States