Models of Eucalypt phenology predict bat population flux.

John R Giles1 Raina K Plowright2 Peggy Eby3 Alison J Peel1 Hamish McCallum1
Affiliations 3 institutions
  1. Environmental Futures Research Institute Griffith University Brisbane Queensland 4111 Australia.
  2. Department of Microbiology and Immunology Montana State University Bozeman Montana 59717.
  3. School of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales 2052 Australia.

Abstract

Fruit bats (Pteropodidae) have received increased attention after the recent emergence of notable viral pathogens of bat origin. Their vagility hinders data collection on abundance and distribution, which constrains modeling efforts and our understanding of bat ecology, viral dynamics, and spillover. We addressed this knowledge gap with models and data on the occurrence and abundance of nectarivorous fruit bat populations at 3 day roosts in southeast Queensland. We used environmental drivers of nectar production as predictors and explored relationships between bat abundance and virus spillover. Specifically, we developed several novel modeling tools motivated by complexities of fruit bat foraging ecology, including: (1) a dataset of spatial variables comprising Eucalypt-focused vegetation indices, cumulative precipitation, and temperature anomaly; (2) an algorithm that associated bat population response with spatial covariates in a spatially and temporally relevant way given our current understanding of bat foraging behavior; and (3) a thorough statistical learning approach to finding optimal covariate combinations. We identified covariates that classify fruit bat occupancy at each of our three study roosts with 86-93% accuracy. Negative binomial models explained 43-53% of the variation in observed abundance across roosts. Our models suggest that spatiotemporal heterogeneity in Eucalypt-based food resources could drive at least 50% of bat population behavior at the landscape scale. We found that 13 spillover events were observed within the foraging range of our study roosts, and they occurred during times when models predicted low population abundance. Our results suggest that, in southeast Queensland, spillover may not be driven by large aggregations of fruit bats attracted by nectar-based resources, but rather by behavior of smaller resident subpopulations. Our models and data integrated remote sensing and statistical learning to make inferences on bat ecology and disease dynamics. This work provides a foundation for further studies on landscape-scale population movement and spatiotemporal disease dynamics.

Supporting text Virus Host Location
Foraging ecology 1 fruit bat 1 Hendra virus 44 henipavirus 30 machine learning 11 population dynamics 8 Pteropus 7 spillover 105 viral prevalence 1

Evidence records

2 total
Zoonotic Surveillance
2 records · 1 evidence types
Evidence type
2 records
OVE2467
Key finding

Modeling indicates that spatiotemporal variation in Eucalypt-based food resources influences fruit bat population behavior and that smaller resident subpopulations in southeast Queensland may contribute to spillover dynamics.

Virus
Not specified
Host
Location
Supporting text

Our models suggest that spatiotemporal heterogeneity in Eucalypt-based food resources could drive at least 50% of bat population behavior at the landscape scale. Our results suggest that, in southeast Queensland, spillover may not be driven by large aggregations of fruit bats attracted by nectar-based resources, but rather by behavior of smaller resident subpopulations.

Method
ecological modeling | statistical learning | remote sensing of vegetation indices
Geographic raw
southeast Queensland
Country inferred
AUS
OVE2466
Key finding

Thirteen animal-to-human spillover events occurred within the foraging range of fruit bat roosts in southeast Queensland.

Virus
Not specified
Host
Location
Supporting text

We found that 13 spillover events were observed within the foraging range of our study roosts, and they occurred during times when models predicted low population abundance.

Method
statistical learning models | remote sensing | field observation
Geographic raw
southeast Queensland