Literature detail

Isolation of ACE2-dependent and -independent sarbecoviruses from Chinese horseshoe bats.

Hua Guo1 Ang Li1,2 Tian-Yi Dong1,2 Hao-Rui Si1,2 Ben Hu1 Bei Li1 Yan Zhu1 Zheng-Li Shi1 Michael Letko3
Affiliations 3 institutions
  1. CAS Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Wuhan, China.
  2. Savaid Medical School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing, China.
  3. Paul G. Allen School for Global Health, Washington State University , Pullman, Washington, USA.
PMID 37655938 2023 J Virol eng ppublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

While the spike proteins from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses-1 and 2 (SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2) bind to host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) to infect cells, the majority of bat sarbecoviruses cannot use ACE2 from any species. Despite their discovery almost 20 years ago, ACE2-independent sarbecoviruses have never been isolated from field samples, leading to the assumption these viruses pose little risk to humans. We have previously shown how spike proteins from a small group of ACE2-independent bat sarbecoviruses may possess the ability to infect human cells in the presence of exogenous trypsin. Here, we adapted our earlier findings into a virus isolation protocol and recovered two new ACE2-dependent viruses, RsYN2012 and RsYN2016A, as well as an ACE2-independent virus, RsHuB2019A. Although our stocks of RsHuB2019A rapidly acquired a tissue-culture adaption that rendered the spike protein resistant to trypsin, trypsin was still required for viral entry, suggesting limitations on the exogenous entry factors that support bat sarbecoviruses. Electron microscopy revealed that ACE2-independent sarbecoviruses have a prominent spike corona and share similar morphology to other coronaviruses. Our findings demonstrate a broader zoonotic threat posed by sarbecoviruses and shed light on the intricacies of coronavirus isolation and propagation <i>in vitro</i>. IMPORTANCE Several coronaviruses have been transmitted from animals to people, and 20 years of virus discovery studies have uncovered thousands of new coronavirus sequences in nature. Most of the animal-derived sarbecoviruses have never been isolated in culture due to cell incompatibilities and a poor understanding of the in vitro requirements for their propagation. Here, we built on our growing body of work characterizing viral entry mechanisms of bat sarbecoviruses in human cells and have developed a virus isolation protocol that allows for the exploration of these understudied viruses. Our protocol is robust and practical, leading to successful isolation of more sarbecoviruses than previous approaches and from field samples that had been collected over a 10-year longitudinal study.

bat coronavirus cross-species transmission sarbecovirus zoonosis Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Betacoronavirus Chiroptera Receptors, Virus Animals East Asian People Humans Longitudinal Studies Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus Trypsin Zoonoses

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

5 total
3 records
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

Bat sarbecoviruses RsYN2012 and RsYN2016A used ACE2 for entry, while RsHuB2019A entered cells through an ACE2-independent but trypsin-dependent mechanism.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We recovered two new ACE2-dependent viruses, RsYN2012 and RsYN2016A, as well as an ACE2-independent virus, RsHuB2019A. Although our stocks of RsHuB2019A rapidly acquired a tissue-culture adaption that rendered the spike protein resistant to trypsin, trypsin was still required for viral entry.

Method
virus isolation; cell-entry assay
Receptors
ACE2
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

Bat sarbecovirus RsYN2016A used ACE2 for cell entry according to isolation and receptor dependence testing.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We recovered two new ACE2-dependent viruses, RsYN2012 and RsYN2016A, as well as an ACE2-independent virus, RsHuB2019A.

Method
virus isolation; cell-entry assay
Receptors
ACE2
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

The bat sarbecovirus RsHuB2019A was ACE2-independent but required trypsin for viral entry, indicating an alternative receptor or entry pathway.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We recovered two new ACE2-dependent viruses, RsYN2012 and RsYN2016A, as well as an ACE2-independent virus, RsHuB2019A. Although our stocks of RsHuB2019A rapidly acquired a tissue-culture adaption that rendered the spike protein resistant to trypsin, trypsin was still required for viral entry.

Method
virus isolation; cell-entry assay
Receptors
ACE2
Host factors
trypsin
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.70
Key finding

The ACE2-independent bat sarbecovirus RsHuB2019A developed a spike protein adaptation conferring resistance to trypsin while retaining trypsin-dependent entry into cells.

Virus
Host
Not specified
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Although our stocks of RsHuB2019A rapidly acquired a tissue-culture adaption that rendered the spike protein resistant to trypsin, trypsin was still required for viral entry, suggesting limitations on the exogenous entry factors that support bat sarbecoviruses.

Genes or proteins
spike protein
Receptors
ACE2
Host factors
trypsin
Mechanism types
cell_entry; receptor_binding; tissue_culture_adaptation
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.80
Key finding

Sarbecoviruses were isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats sampled during a decade-long field surveillance study, revealing both ACE2-dependent and ACE2-independent bat coronaviruses.

Virus
Location
Supporting text

We adapted our earlier findings into a virus isolation protocol and recovered two new ACE2-dependent viruses, RsYN2012 and RsYN2016A, as well as an ACE2-independent virus, RsHuB2019A, from field samples that had been collected over a 10-year longitudinal study of Chinese horseshoe bats.

Method
virus isolation; longitudinal study
Geographic raw
China
Country inferred
China