Literature detail

Are swine workers in the United States at increased risk of infection with zoonotic influenza virus?

Kendall P Myers1 Christopher W Olsen Sharon F Setterquist Ana W Capuano Kelley J Donham Eileen L Thacker James A Merchant Gregory C Gray
Affiliations 1 institutions
  1. Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
PMID 16323086 2006 Clin Infect Dis eng ppublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

Pandemic influenza strains originate in nonhuman species. Pigs have an important role in interspecies transmission of the virus. We examined multiple swine-exposed human populations in the nation's number 1 swine-producing state for evidence of previous swine influenza virus infection. We performed controlled, cross-sectional seroprevalence studies among 111 farmers, 97 meat processing workers, 65 veterinarians, and 79 control subjects using serum samples collected during the period of 2002-2004. Serum samples were tested using a hemagglutination inhibition assay against the following 6 influenza A virus isolates collected recently from pigs and humans: A/Swine/WI/238/97 (H1N1), A/Swine/WI/R33F/01 (H1N2), A/Swine/Minnesota/593/99 (H3N2), A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1), A/Panama/2007/99 (H3N2), and A/Nanchang/933/95 (H3N2). Using multivariable proportional odds modeling, all 3 exposed study groups demonstrated markedly elevated titers against the H1N1 and H1N2 swine influenza virus isolates, compared with control subjects. Farmers had the strongest indication of exposure to swine H1N1 virus infection (odds ratio [OR], 35.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-161.8), followed by veterinarians (OR, 17.8; 95% CI, 3.8-82.7), and meat processing workers (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.4-29.5). Similarly, farmers had the highest odds for exposure to swine H1N2 virus (OR, 13.8; 95% CI, 5.4-35.4), followed by veterinarians (OR, 9.5; 95% CI, 3.6-24.6) and meat processing workers (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.7). Occupational exposure to pigs greatly increases workers' risk of swine influenza virus infection. Swine workers should be included in pandemic surveillance and in antiviral and immunization strategies.

Adult Agricultural Workers' Diseases Animals Antibodies, Viral Cross-Sectional Studies Female Humans Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype Influenza, Human Male Orthomyxoviridae Infections Risk Factors Seroepidemiologic Studies Swine Swine Diseases United States Zoonoses

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

4 total
2 records
Extraction confidence 1.00
Key finding

Farmers, veterinarians, and meat processing workers in the United States showed elevated antibody titers to swine-origin H1N1 influenza virus, evidencing prior occupational exposure or infection.

Virus
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We performed controlled, cross-sectional seroprevalence studies among 111 farmers, 97 meat processing workers, 65 veterinarians, and 79 control subjects using serum samples collected during 2002-2004. Serum samples were tested using a hemagglutination inhibition assay against swine influenza virus isolates. All 3 exposed study groups demonstrated markedly elevated titers against the H1N1 swine influenza virus isolates compared with control subjects.

Method
seroprevalence study; hemagglutination inhibition assay
Sample type
serum
Extraction confidence 1.00
Key finding

Swine-exposed workers exhibited elevated antibody titers to swine-origin H1N2 influenza virus, indicating prior zoonotic exposure.

Virus
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Serum samples were tested using a hemagglutination inhibition assay against swine influenza virus isolates. All 3 exposed study groups demonstrated markedly elevated titers against the H1N2 swine influenza virus isolates compared with control subjects.

Method
seroprevalence study; hemagglutination inhibition assay
Sample type
serum
2 records
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

Serological evidence indicates animal-to-human transmission of H1N1 and H1N2 swine influenza viruses among swine-exposed workers in the United States.

Virus
Location
Supporting text

All 3 exposed study groups demonstrated markedly elevated titers against the H1N1 and H1N2 swine influenza virus isolates, compared with control subjects. Occupational exposure to pigs greatly increases workers' risk of swine influenza virus infection.

Method
hemagglutination inhibition assay
Study design
serological survey
Transmission direction
animal-to-human
Geographic raw
United States
Country inferred
United States
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

Serological evidence indicates animal-to-human transmission of H1N2 swine influenza viruses among swine-exposed workers in the United States.

Virus
Location
Supporting text

All 3 exposed study groups demonstrated markedly elevated titers against the H1N1 and H1N2 swine influenza virus isolates, compared with control subjects. Occupational exposure to pigs greatly increases workers' risk of swine influenza virus infection.

Method
hemagglutination inhibition assay
Study design
serological survey
Transmission direction
animal-to-human
Geographic raw
United States
Country inferred
United States