Are swine workers in the United States at increased risk of infection with zoonotic influenza virus?

Kendall P Myers1 Christopher W Olsen Sharon F Setterquist Ana W Capuano Kelley J Donham Eileen L Thacker James A Merchant Gregory C Gray
Affiliations 1 institutions
  1. Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Abstract

Pandemic influenza strains originate in nonhuman species. Pigs have an important role in interspecies transmission of the virus. We examined multiple swine-exposed human populations in the nation's number 1 swine-producing state for evidence of previous swine influenza virus infection. We performed controlled, cross-sectional seroprevalence studies among 111 farmers, 97 meat processing workers, 65 veterinarians, and 79 control subjects using serum samples collected during the period of 2002-2004. Serum samples were tested using a hemagglutination inhibition assay against the following 6 influenza A virus isolates collected recently from pigs and humans: A/Swine/WI/238/97 (H1N1), A/Swine/WI/R33F/01 (H1N2), A/Swine/Minnesota/593/99 (H3N2), A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1), A/Panama/2007/99 (H3N2), and A/Nanchang/933/95 (H3N2). Using multivariable proportional odds modeling, all 3 exposed study groups demonstrated markedly elevated titers against the H1N1 and H1N2 swine influenza virus isolates, compared with control subjects. Farmers had the strongest indication of exposure to swine H1N1 virus infection (odds ratio [OR], 35.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-161.8), followed by veterinarians (OR, 17.8; 95% CI, 3.8-82.7), and meat processing workers (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.4-29.5). Similarly, farmers had the highest odds for exposure to swine H1N2 virus (OR, 13.8; 95% CI, 5.4-35.4), followed by veterinarians (OR, 9.5; 95% CI, 3.6-24.6) and meat processing workers (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.7). Occupational exposure to pigs greatly increases workers' risk of swine influenza virus infection. Swine workers should be included in pandemic surveillance and in antiviral and immunization strategies.

Supporting text Virus Host Location
Adult 71 Agricultural Workers' Diseases 3 Animals 1948 Antibodies, Viral 212 Cross-Sectional Studies 35 Female 289 Humans 1440 Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype 74 Influenza, Human 286 Male 224 Orthomyxoviridae Infections 228 Risk Factors 34 Seroepidemiologic Studies 113 Swine 258 Swine Diseases 153 United States 46 Zoonoses 397

Evidence records

7 total
Zoonotic Surveillance
7 records · 1 evidence types
Evidence type
7 records
OVE269
Key finding

Farmers in the United States had significantly elevated antibody titers to swine H1N1 influenza virus compared with control subjects, indicating previous exposure.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Farmers had the strongest indication of exposure to swine H1N1 virus infection (odds ratio [OR], 35.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-161.8)

Method
hemagglutination inhibition assay
Sample type
serum samples
OVE272
Key finding

Farmers had significantly elevated antibody titers against swine H1N2 influenza virus compared with control subjects, supporting prior exposure.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Farmers had the highest odds for exposure to swine H1N2 virus (OR, 13.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4-35.4)

Method
hemagglutination inhibition assay
Sample type
serum samples
OVE275
Key finding

Humans occupationally exposed to pigs showed increased risk of swine influenza virus infection, indicating animal-to-human spillover.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

Are swine workers in the United States at increased risk of infection with zoonotic influenza virus? Occupational exposure to pigs greatly increases workers' risk of swine influenza virus infection.

Method
hemagglutination inhibition assay | multivariable proportional odds modeling
OVE270
Key finding

Veterinarians in the United States had elevated antibody titers to swine H1N1 influenza virus compared with controls, suggesting occupational exposure.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Veterinarians had elevated titers against the H1N1 swine influenza virus isolates (odds ratio [OR], 17.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-82.7)

Method
hemagglutination inhibition assay
Sample type
serum samples
OVE271
Key finding

Meat processing workers showed elevated antibody titers to swine H1N1 influenza virus compared with controls, indicating prior exposure.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Meat processing workers had elevated titers against the H1N1 swine influenza virus isolates (odds ratio [OR], 6.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-29.5)

Method
hemagglutination inhibition assay
Sample type
serum samples
OVE273
Key finding

Veterinarians had elevated antibody titers against swine H1N2 influenza virus compared with controls, consistent with occupational exposure.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Veterinarians had elevated titers against the H1N2 swine influenza virus isolates (odds ratio [OR], 9.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6-24.6)

Method
hemagglutination inhibition assay
Sample type
serum samples
OVE274
Key finding

Meat processing workers showed elevated antibody titers against swine H1N2 influenza virus compared with control subjects, indicating prior exposure.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Meat processing workers had elevated titers against the H1N2 swine influenza virus isolates (odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-6.7)

Method
hemagglutination inhibition assay
Sample type
serum samples