Literature detail

The evolutionary history of ACE2 usage within the coronavirus subgenus <i>Sarbecovirus</i>.

H L Wells1 M Letko2,3 G Lasso4 B Ssebide5 J Nziza5 D K Byarugaba6,7 I Navarrete-Macias8 E Liang8 M Cranfield9,10 B A Han11 M W Tingley12 M Diuk-Wasser1 T Goldstein9 C K Johnson9 J A K Mazet9 K Chandran4 V J Munster3 K Gilardi6,9 S J Anthony13
Affiliations 13 institutions
  1. Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 1200 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY 10027, USA.
  2. Laboratory of Virology, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 903 S. 4th St, Hamilton, MT 59840, USA.
  3. Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, 1155 College Ave, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
  4. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10462, USA.
  5. Gorilla Doctors, c/o MGVP, Inc., 1089 Veterinary Medicine Drive, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
  6. Makerere University Walter Reed Project, Plot 42, Nakasero Road, Kampala, Uganda.
  7. Makerere University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Living Stone Road, Kampala, Uganda.
  8. Center for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA.
  9. One Health Institute and Karen C. Drayer Wildlife Health Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, 1089 Veterinary Medicine Drive, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
  10. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 125 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  11. Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, 2801 Sharon Turnpike, Millbrook, NY 12545, USA.
  12. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, 612 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
  13. Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
PMID 33754082 2021 Virus Evol eng epublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 (SARS-CoV-1) and SARS-CoV-2 are not phylogenetically closely related; however, both use the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor in humans for cell entry. This is not a universal sarbecovirus trait; for example, many known sarbecoviruses related to SARS-CoV-1 have two deletions in the receptor binding domain of the spike protein that render them incapable of using human ACE2. Here, we report three sequences of a novel sarbecovirus from Rwanda and Uganda that are phylogenetically intermediate to SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 and demonstrate via in vitro studies that they are also unable to utilize human ACE2. Furthermore, we show that the observed pattern of ACE2 usage among sarbecoviruses is best explained by recombination not of SARS-CoV-2, but of SARS-CoV-1 and its relatives. We show that the lineage that includes SARS-CoV-2 is most likely the ancestral ACE2-using lineage, and that recombination with at least one virus from this group conferred ACE2 usage to the lineage including SARS-CoV-1 at some time in the past. We argue that alternative scenarios such as convergent evolution are much less parsimonious; we show that biogeography and patterns of host tropism support the plausibility of a recombination scenario, and we propose a competitive release hypothesis to explain how this recombination event could have occurred and why it is evolutionarily advantageous. The findings provide important insights into the natural history of ACE2 usage for both SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 and a greater understanding of the evolutionary mechanisms that shape zoonotic potential of coronaviruses. This study also underscores the need for increased surveillance for sarbecoviruses in southwestern China, where most ACE2-using viruses have been found to date, as well as other regions such as Africa, where these viruses have only recently been discovered.

coronavirus recombination viral ecology virus evolution

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

6 total
3 records
Extraction confidence 1.00
Key finding

SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 use human ACE2 as a receptor for cell entry, while African sarbecoviruses from Rwanda and Uganda do not bind or utilize human ACE2; ACE2 usage in sarbecoviruses originated through recombination between ancestral lineages.

Virus
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Both SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 use the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor in humans for cell entry, whereas many related sarbecoviruses and newly described viruses from Rwanda and Uganda are unable to utilize human ACE2.

Method
in vitro study
Receptors
ACE2
Extraction confidence 1.00
Key finding

SARS-CoV-2 uses human ACE2 for cellular entry.

Virus
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Both SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 use the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor in humans for cell entry.

Receptors
ACE2
Extraction confidence 1.00
Key finding

Novel sarbecoviruses from Rwanda and Uganda do not use human ACE2 for entry.

Virus
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Three sequences of a novel sarbecovirus from Rwanda and Uganda were demonstrated via in vitro studies to be unable to utilize human ACE2.

Method
in vitro study
Receptors
ACE2
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

Phylogenetic and recombination analyses of new sarbecovirus sequences from Rwanda and Uganda indicate that SARS-CoV-2–related viruses form the ancestral ACE2-using lineage, and recombination with this group transferred ACE2 usage to the SARS-CoV-1 lineage.

Virus
Host
Not specified
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We report three sequences of a novel sarbecovirus from Rwanda and Uganda that are phylogenetically intermediate to SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 and demonstrate via in vitro studies that they are also unable to utilize human ACE2. Furthermore, we show that the observed pattern of ACE2 usage among sarbecoviruses is best explained by recombination not of SARS-CoV-2, but of SARS-CoV-1 and its relatives.

Genes or proteins
spike; receptor binding domain
Analysis methods
phylogenetic analysis; recombination analysis
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

Recombination between SARS-CoV-1 and an ACE2-using lineage related to SARS-CoV-2 conferred ACE2 usage upon the SARS-CoV-1 lineage.

Host
Not specified
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We show that the observed pattern of ACE2 usage among sarbecoviruses is best explained by recombination not of SARS-CoV-2, but of SARS-CoV-1 and its relatives. We show that the lineage that includes SARS-CoV-2 is most likely the ancestral ACE2-using lineage, and that recombination with at least one virus from this group conferred ACE2 usage to the lineage including SARS-CoV-1 at some time in the past.

Event type
recombination
Genes or segments
spike
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.80
Key finding

Genomic sequences of a novel sarbecovirus were identified from wildlife samples in Rwanda and Uganda, highlighting regions for continued sarbecovirus surveillance.

Virus
Host
Not specified
Location
Supporting text

Here, we report three sequences of a novel sarbecovirus from Rwanda and Uganda... This study also underscores the need for increased surveillance for sarbecoviruses in southwestern China, where most ACE2-using viruses have been found to date, as well as other regions such as Africa, where these viruses have only recently been discovered.

Method
genomic sequencing
Geographic raw
Rwanda and Uganda