Literature detail

Coronavirus surveillance in wildlife from two Congo basin countries detects RNA of multiple species circulating in bats and rodents.

Charles Kumakamba1 Fabien R Niama2 Francisca Muyembe1 Jean-Vivien Mombouli2 Placide Mbala Kingebeni1 Rock Aime Nina3 Ipos Ngay Lukusa1 Gerard Bounga4 Frida N'Kawa1 Cynthia Goma Nkoua2 Joseph Atibu Losoma1 Prime Mulembakani1 Maria Makuwa1,5 Ubald Tamufe6 Amethyst Gillis7 Matthew LeBreton8 Sarah H Olson4 Kenneth Cameron4 Patricia Reed4 Alain Ondzie4 Alex Tremeau-Bravard9 Brett R Smith9 Jasmine Pante9 Bradley S Schneider7 David J McIver10 James A Ayukekbong10 Nicole A Hoff11 Anne W Rimoin11 Anne Laudisoit12 Corina Monagin7,9 Tracey Goldstein9 Damien O Joly4,10 Karen Saylors5,7 Nathan D Wolfe7 Edward M Rubin7 Romain Bagamboula MPassi13 Jean J Muyembe Tamfum14 Christian E Lange5,10
Affiliations 14 institutions
  1. Metabiota Inc, Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
  2. National Laboratory of Public Health, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo.
  3. Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo.
  4. Wildlife Conversation Society, Bronx, New York, United States of America.
  5. Labyringth Global Health St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America.
  6. Metabiota Cameroon Ltd, Yaoundé, Centre, Cameroon.
  7. Metabiota Inc, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
  8. Mosaic, Yaoundé, Centre, Cameroon.
  9. One Health Institute, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
  10. Metabiota Inc, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.
  11. Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
  12. EcoHealth Alliance, New York, New York, United States of America.
  13. Ministry of National Defense, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
  14. Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale, Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
PMID 34106949 2021 PLoS One eng epublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

Coronaviruses play an important role as pathogens of humans and animals, and the emergence of epidemics like SARS, MERS and COVID-19 is closely linked to zoonotic transmission events primarily from wild animals. Bats have been found to be an important source of coronaviruses with some of them having the potential to infect humans, with other animals serving as intermediate or alternate hosts or reservoirs. Host diversity may be an important contributor to viral diversity and thus the potential for zoonotic events. To date, limited research has been done in Africa on this topic, in particular in the Congo Basin despite frequent contact between humans and wildlife in this region. We sampled and, using consensus coronavirus PCR-primers, tested 3,561 wild animals for coronavirus RNA. The focus was on bats (38%), rodents (38%), and primates (23%) that posed an elevated risk for contact with people, and we found coronavirus RNA in 121 animals, of which all but two were bats. Depending on the taxonomic family, bats were significantly more likely to be coronavirus RNA-positive when sampled either in the wet (Pteropodidae and Rhinolophidae) or dry season (Hipposideridae, Miniopteridae, Molossidae, and Vespertilionidae). The detected RNA sequences correspond to 15 alpha- and 6 betacoronaviruses, with some of them being very similar (>95% nucleotide identities) to known coronaviruses and others being more unique and potentially representing novel viruses. In seven of the bats, we detected RNA most closely related to sequences of the human common cold coronaviruses 229E or NL63 (>80% nucleotide identities). The findings highlight the potential for coronavirus spillover, especially in regions with a high diversity of bats and close human contact, and reinforces the need for ongoing surveillance.

Animals Animals, Wild Chiroptera Congo Coronavirus Coronavirus Infections Democratic Republic of the Congo Environmental Monitoring Phylogeny RNA, Viral Rodentia

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

3 total
2 records
Extraction confidence 1.00
Key finding

Coronavirus RNA was detected in bats and rodents during wildlife surveillance in the Congo Basin using PCR, with most positives found in bats.

Host
Location
Supporting text

We sampled and, using consensus coronavirus PCR-primers, tested 3,561 wild animals for coronavirus RNA. The focus was on bats (38%), rodents (38%), and primates (23%) that posed an elevated risk for contact with people, and we found coronavirus RNA in 121 animals, of which all but two were bats.

Method
PCR
Geographic raw
Congo Basin
Country inferred
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Extraction confidence 1.00
Key finding

Coronavirus surveillance tested rodents in the Congo Basin for coronavirus RNA using PCR, but most positive results occurred in bats.

Host
Location
Supporting text

We sampled and, using consensus coronavirus PCR-primers, tested 3,561 wild animals for coronavirus RNA. The focus was on bats (38%), rodents (38%), and primates (23%) that posed an elevated risk for contact with people.

Method
PCR
Geographic raw
Congo Basin
Country inferred
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.80
Key finding

RNA sequences from bats showed high nucleotide identity with human coronaviruses 229E and NL63, revealing close phylogenetic relationships between bat and human coronaviruses in the Congo Basin.

Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

The detected RNA sequences correspond to 15 alpha- and 6 betacoronaviruses, with some of them being very similar (>95% nucleotide identities) to known coronaviruses and others being more unique and potentially representing novel viruses. In seven of the bats, we detected RNA most closely related to sequences of the human common cold coronaviruses 229E or NL63 (>80% nucleotide identities).

Genes or proteins
RNA
Analysis methods
genetic similarity analysis; phylogenetic analysis