Coronavirus surveillance in wildlife from two Congo basin countries detects RNA of multiple species circulating in bats and rodents.

Charles Kumakamba1 Fabien R Niama2 Francisca Muyembe1 Jean-Vivien Mombouli2 Placide Mbala Kingebeni1 Rock Aime Nina3 Ipos Ngay Lukusa1 Gerard Bounga4 Frida N'Kawa1 Cynthia Goma Nkoua2 Joseph Atibu Losoma1 Prime Mulembakani1 Maria Makuwa1,5 Ubald Tamufe6 Amethyst Gillis7 Matthew LeBreton8 Sarah H Olson4 Kenneth Cameron4 Patricia Reed4 Alain Ondzie4 Alex Tremeau-Bravard9 Brett R Smith9 Jasmine Pante9 Bradley S Schneider7 David J McIver10 James A Ayukekbong10 Nicole A Hoff11 Anne W Rimoin11 Anne Laudisoit12 Corina Monagin7,9 Tracey Goldstein9 Damien O Joly4,10 Karen Saylors5,7 Nathan D Wolfe7 Edward M Rubin7 Romain Bagamboula MPassi13 Jean J Muyembe Tamfum14 Christian E Lange5,10
Affiliations 14 institutions
  1. Metabiota Inc, Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
  2. National Laboratory of Public Health, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo.
  3. Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo.
  4. Wildlife Conversation Society, Bronx, New York, United States of America.
  5. Labyringth Global Health St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America.
  6. Metabiota Cameroon Ltd, Yaoundé, Centre, Cameroon.
  7. Metabiota Inc, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
  8. Mosaic, Yaoundé, Centre, Cameroon.
  9. One Health Institute, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
  10. Metabiota Inc, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.
  11. Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
  12. EcoHealth Alliance, New York, New York, United States of America.
  13. Ministry of National Defense, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
  14. Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale, Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Abstract

Coronaviruses play an important role as pathogens of humans and animals, and the emergence of epidemics like SARS, MERS and COVID-19 is closely linked to zoonotic transmission events primarily from wild animals. Bats have been found to be an important source of coronaviruses with some of them having the potential to infect humans, with other animals serving as intermediate or alternate hosts or reservoirs. Host diversity may be an important contributor to viral diversity and thus the potential for zoonotic events. To date, limited research has been done in Africa on this topic, in particular in the Congo Basin despite frequent contact between humans and wildlife in this region. We sampled and, using consensus coronavirus PCR-primers, tested 3,561 wild animals for coronavirus RNA. The focus was on bats (38%), rodents (38%), and primates (23%) that posed an elevated risk for contact with people, and we found coronavirus RNA in 121 animals, of which all but two were bats. Depending on the taxonomic family, bats were significantly more likely to be coronavirus RNA-positive when sampled either in the wet (Pteropodidae and Rhinolophidae) or dry season (Hipposideridae, Miniopteridae, Molossidae, and Vespertilionidae). The detected RNA sequences correspond to 15 alpha- and 6 betacoronaviruses, with some of them being very similar (>95% nucleotide identities) to known coronaviruses and others being more unique and potentially representing novel viruses. In seven of the bats, we detected RNA most closely related to sequences of the human common cold coronaviruses 229E or NL63 (>80% nucleotide identities). The findings highlight the potential for coronavirus spillover, especially in regions with a high diversity of bats and close human contact, and reinforces the need for ongoing surveillance.

Supporting text Virus Host Location
Animals 1948 Animals, Wild 187 Chiroptera 371 Congo 8 Coronavirus 92 Coronavirus Infections 171 Democratic Republic of the Congo 13 Environmental Monitoring 5 Phylogeny 805 RNA, Viral 193 Rodentia 51

Evidence records

4 total
Zoonotic Surveillance
4 records · 2 evidence types
Evidence type
3 records
OVE4853
Key finding

Coronavirus RNA was detected in 121 wildlife samples, mostly from bats and two rodents in the Congo Basin.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

We sampled and, using consensus coronavirus PCR-primers, tested 3,561 wild animals for coronavirus RNA. The focus was on bats (38%), rodents (38%), and primates (23%) that posed an elevated risk for contact with people, and we found coronavirus RNA in 121 animals, of which all but two were bats.

Method
consensus coronavirus PCR-primers
Sample type
wildlife samples
Geographic raw
Congo Basin
OVE4854
Key finding

Detected coronavirus RNA sequences from bats corresponded to 15 alphacoronaviruses and 6 betacoronaviruses.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

The detected RNA sequences correspond to 15 alpha- and 6 betacoronaviruses, with some of them being very similar (>95% nucleotide identities) to known coronaviruses and others being more unique and potentially representing novel viruses.

Method
RNA sequencing
Sample type
bat samples
OVE4855
Key finding

RNA most closely related to human coronaviruses 229E or NL63 was detected in seven bats.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

In seven of the bats, we detected RNA most closely related to sequences of the human common cold coronaviruses 229E or NL63 (>80% nucleotide identities).

Method
RNA sequencing | PCR detection
Sample type
bat samples
Evidence type
1 records
OVE4856
Key finding

Bat families in surveyed Congo Basin countries showed seasonally distinct coronavirus RNA positivity, revealing host-family and seasonal ecological patterns of viral circulation.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

Coronavirus surveillance in wildlife from two Congo basin countries detects RNA of multiple species circulating in bats and rodents. Depending on the taxonomic family, bats were significantly more likely to be coronavirus RNA-positive when sampled either in the wet (Pteropodidae and Rhinolophidae) or dry season (Hipposideridae, Miniopteridae, Molossidae, and Vespertilionidae).

Method
consensus coronavirus PCR-primers | statistical comparison of positivity by host family and season
Sample type
bat samples
Geographic raw
Congo basin