Literature detail

Experimental and field investigations of exposure, replication and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in pigs in the Netherlands.

Reina S Sikkema1 Tijs Tobias2 Nadia Oreshkova3 Erwin de Bruin1 Nisreen Okba1 Felicity Chandler1 Marcel M Hulst3 Jordi Rodon4 Manon Houben5 Kees van Maanen5 Hans Bultman5 Marina Meester2 Nora M Gerhards3 Martijn Bouwknegt6 Bert Urlings6 Bart Haagmans1 Jan Kluytmans7 Corine H GeurtsvanKessel1 Wim H M van der Poel3 Marion P G Koopmans1 Arjan Stegeman2
Affiliations 7 institutions
  1. Department Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  2. Department Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  3. Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
  4. IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.
  5. Royal GD Animal Health, Deventer, The Netherlands.
  6. Vion Food Group, Boxtel, The Netherlands.
  7. Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
PMID 34839786 2022 Emerg Microbes Infect eng ppublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

In order to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, transmission and reservoir development in swine, we combined results of an experimental and two observational studies. First, intranasal and intratracheal challenge of eight pigs did not result in infection, based on clinical signs and PCR on swab and lung tissue samples. Two serum samples returned a low positive result in virus neutralization, in line with findings in other infection experiments in pigs. Next, a retrospective observational study was performed in the Netherlands in the spring of 2020. Serum samples (N =417) obtained at slaughter from 17 farms located in a region with a high human case incidence in the first wave of the pandemic. Samples were tested with protein micro array, plaque reduction neutralization test and receptor-binding-domain ELISA. None of the serum samples was positive in all three assays, although six samples from one farm returned a low positive result in PRNT (titers 40-80). Therefore we conclude that serological evidence for large scale transmission was not observed. Finally, an outbreak of respiratory disease in pigs on one farm, coinciding with recent exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infected animal caretakers, was investigated. Tonsil swabs and paired serum samples were tested. No evidence for infection with SARS-CoV-2 was found. In conclusion, Although in both the experimental and the observational study few samples returned low antibody titer results in PRNT infection with SARS-CoV-2 was not confirmed. It was concluded that sporadic infections in the field cannot be excluded, but large-scale SARS-CoV-2 transmission among pigs is unlikely.

antibody Coronavirus One Health SARS-CoV-2 Swine Animals COVID-19 Environmental Exposure Netherlands Public Health Surveillance Retrospective Studies SARS-CoV-2 Swine Swine Diseases

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

6 total
3 records
Extraction confidence 0.90
Key finding

Two pig serum samples had low positive neutralizing antibody results to SARS-CoV-2, though infection was not confirmed.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Two serum samples returned a low positive result in virus neutralization, in line with findings in other infection experiments in pigs.

Method
virus neutralization
Sample type
serum
Extraction confidence 0.90
Key finding

Six serum samples from one pig farm showed low PRNT titers to SARS-CoV-2, but no evidence of widespread transmission was found.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

None of the serum samples was positive in all three assays, although six samples from one farm returned a low positive result in PRNT (titers 40-80). Therefore we conclude that serological evidence for large scale transmission was not observed.

Method
plaque reduction neutralization test; protein micro array; receptor-binding-domain ELISA
Sample type
serum
Extraction confidence 0.90
Key finding

Paired serum samples from pigs exposed to infected caretakers showed no serological evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Tonsil swabs and paired serum samples were tested. No evidence for infection with SARS-CoV-2 was found.

Sample type
serum
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

Experimental intranasal and intratracheal inoculation of pigs with SARS-CoV-2 did not result in infection, indicating limited susceptibility.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Intranasal and intratracheal challenge of eight pigs did not result in infection, based on clinical signs and PCR on swab and lung tissue samples.

Method
intranasal challenge; intratracheal challenge; PCR; virus neutralization test
Sample type
swab; lung tissue; serum
Experimental system
in vivo animal experiment
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.70
Key finding

Human-to-pig exposure occurred after caretakers infected with SARS-CoV-2, but no infection was detected in pigs.

Virus
Location
Supporting text

An outbreak of respiratory disease in pigs on one farm, coinciding with recent exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infected animal caretakers, was investigated. Tonsil swabs and paired serum samples were tested. No evidence for infection with SARS-CoV-2 was found.

Method
PCR; serology
Study design
outbreak investigation
Transmission direction
human-to-animal
Geographic raw
Netherlands
Country inferred
Netherlands
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.90
Key finding

Serological surveillance of 417 pig serum samples from slaughterhouses in the Netherlands showed no confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, indicating lack of large-scale transmission among pigs.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

A retrospective observational study was performed in the Netherlands in the spring of 2020. Serum samples (N =417) obtained at slaughter from 17 farms located in a region with a high human case incidence in the first wave of the pandemic. Samples were tested with protein micro array, plaque reduction neutralization test and receptor-binding-domain ELISA. None of the serum samples was positive in all three assays, although six samples from one farm returned a low positive result in PRNT (titers 40-80). Therefore we conclude that serological evidence for large scale transmission was not observed.

Method
protein micro array; plaque reduction neutralization test; receptor-binding-domain ELISA
Sample type
serum
Geographic raw
Netherlands
Country inferred
Netherlands