The SARS-CoV-2 Exerts a Distinctive Strategy for Interacting with the ACE2 Human Receptor.

Esther S Brielle1,2 Dina Schneidman-Duhovny1,3 Michal Linial1
Affiliations 3 institutions
  1. Department of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
  2. The Alexander Grass Center for Bioengineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
  3. The Rachel and Selim Benin School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.

Abstract

The COVID-19 disease has plagued over 200 countries with over three million cases and has resulted in over 200,000 deaths within 3 months. To gain insight into the high infection rate of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, we compare the interaction between the human ACE2 receptor and the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with that of other pathogenic coronaviruses using molecular dynamics simulations. SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and HCoV-NL63 recognize ACE2 as the natural receptor but present a distinct binding interface to ACE2 and a different network of residue-residue contacts. SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 have comparable binding affinities achieved by balancing energetics and dynamics. The SARS-CoV-2-ACE2 complex contains a higher number of contacts, a larger interface area, and decreased interface residue fluctuations relative to the SARS-CoV-ACE2 complex. These findings expose an exceptional evolutionary exploration exerted by coronaviruses toward host recognition. We postulate that the versatility of cell receptor binding strategies has immediate implications for therapeutic strategies.

Supporting text Virus Host Location
ACE2 54 coronavirus evolution 1 molecular dynamics 11 protein–protein complex 1 SARS-CoV-2 550 virus–host interactions 1 Receptors, Virus 204 Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 177 Betacoronavirus 78 Coronavirus NL63, Human 3 Humans 1440 Molecular Dynamics Simulation 21 Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A 57 Protein Domains 45 SARS-CoV-2 453 Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 78 Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus 274 ACE2 protein, human 87 spike protein, SARS-CoV-2 157

Evidence records

2 total
Functional Mechanism
1 records · 1 evidence types
Evidence type
1 records
OVE3768
Key finding

SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and HCoV-NL63 use the human ACE2 receptor, each displaying distinct binding interfaces with ACE2.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

To gain insight into the high infection rate of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, we compare the interaction between the human ACE2 receptor and the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with that of other pathogenic coronaviruses using molecular dynamics simulations. SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and HCoV-NL63 recognize ACE2 as the natural receptor but present a distinct binding interface to ACE2 and a different network of residue-residue contacts.

Method
molecular dynamics simulation
Receptors
ACE2
Genomic Evolution
1 records · 1 evidence types
Evidence type
1 records
OVE3770
Key finding

Comparative structural analysis indicates that coronaviruses have undergone evolutionary diversification in their strategies for recognizing the human ACE2 receptor.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We compare the interaction between the human ACE2 receptor and the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with that of other pathogenic coronaviruses using molecular dynamics simulations. SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and HCoV-NL63 recognize ACE2 as the natural receptor but present a distinct binding interface to ACE2 and a different network of residue-residue contacts. These findings expose an exceptional evolutionary exploration exerted by coronaviruses toward host recognition.

Genes or proteins
spike protein | ACE2 receptor
Analysis methods
molecular dynamics simulations | comparative structural analysis