Human-animal interactions and bat coronavirus spillover potential among rural residents in Southern China.

Hongying Li1,2 Emma Mendelsohn1 Chen Zong3 Wei Zhang4 Emily Hagan1 Ning Wang4 Shiyue Li4 Hong Yan5 Huimin Huang5 Guangjian Zhu1 Noam Ross1 Aleksei Chmura1 Philip Terry6 Mark Fielder2 Maureen Miller7 Zhengli Shi4 Peter Daszak1
Affiliations 7 institutions
  1. EcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY, USA.
  2. School of Life Science, Engineering and Computing, Kingston University, London, UK.
  3. School of Education and Human Development, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
  4. Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China.
  5. School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China.
  6. Directorate of Research, Business and Innovation, Kingston University, London, UK.
  7. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Abstract

Human interaction with animals has been implicated as a primary risk factor for several high impact zoonoses, including many bat-origin viral diseases. However the animal-to-human spillover events that lead to emerging diseases are rarely observed or clinically examined, and the link between specific interactions and spillover risk is poorly understood. To investigate this phenomenon, we conducted biological-behavioral surveillance among rural residents in Yunnan, Guangxi, and Guangdong districts of Southern China, where we have identified a number of SARS-related coronaviruses in bats. Serum samples were tested for four bat-borne coronaviruses using newly developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Survey data were used to characterize associations between human-animal contact and bat coronavirus spillover risk. A total of 1,596 residents were enrolled in the study from 2015 to 2017. Nine participants (0.6%) tested positive for bat coronaviruses. 265 (17%) participants reported severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) and/or influenza-like illness (ILI) symptoms in the past year, which were associated with poultry, carnivore, rodent/shrew, or bat contact, with variability by family income and district of residence. This study provides serological evidence of bat coronavirus spillover in rural communities in Southern China. The low seroprevalence observed in this study suggests that bat coronavirus spillover is a rare event. Nonetheless, this study highlights associations between human-animal interaction and zoonotic spillover risk. These findings can be used to support targeted biological behavioral surveillance in high-risk geographic areas in order to reduce the risk of zoonotic disease emergence.

Supporting text Virus Host Location
Bat coronavirus 8 Disease emergence 6 Human-animal interaction 1 Rural community 1 Southern China 1

Evidence records

3 total
Zoonotic Surveillance
3 records · 2 evidence types
Evidence type
1 records
OVE3832
Key finding

SARS-related coronaviruses were detected in bats from Yunnan, Guangxi, and Guangdong districts of Southern China.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

We conducted biological-behavioral surveillance among rural residents in Yunnan, Guangxi, and Guangdong districts of Southern China, where we have identified a number of SARS-related coronaviruses in bats.

Method
viral identification | surveillance
Geographic raw
Yunnan | Guangxi | Guangdong | Southern China
Country inferred
CHN
Evidence type
2 records
OVE3830
Key finding

Serological detection in rural residents indicates bat coronavirus spillover from bats to humans in Southern China.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

This study provides serological evidence of bat coronavirus spillover in rural communities in Southern China.

Method
serological testing | enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)
OVE3829
Key finding

Nine participants (0.6%) among rural residents in Southern China tested positive for antibodies to bat coronaviruses, providing serological evidence of past exposure.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We conducted biological-behavioral surveillance among rural residents in Yunnan, Guangxi, and Guangdong districts of Southern China. Serum samples were tested for four bat-borne coronaviruses using newly developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Nine participants (0.6%) tested positive for bat coronaviruses. This study provides serological evidence of bat coronavirus spillover in rural communities in Southern China.

Method
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)
Sample type
serum samples