Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 infection in urban and peri-urban wildlife species from Catalonia (Spain).

Leira Fernández-Bastit1,2 Tomás Montalvo3,4,5 Sandra Franco3 Laura Barahona3,5 Manel López-Bejar6 Annais Carbajal6 Encarna Casas-Díaz7 Francesc Closa-Sebastià7 Joaquim Segalés8,9 Júlia Vergara-Alert10,11
Affiliations 11 institutions
  1. Unitat Mixta d'investigació IRTA-UAB en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus, Bellaterra, 08193, Catalonia, Spain.
  2. Programa de Sanitat Animal, IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus, Bellaterra, 08193, Catalonia, Spain.
  3. Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  4. CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain.
  5. Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, Barcelona, 08041, Spain.
  6. Departament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193, Catalonia, Spain.
  7. CLOSA IGM SL, Vets&Wildlife©, Terrassa, 08224, Catalonia, Spain.
  8. Unitat Mixta d'investigació IRTA-UAB en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus, Bellaterra, 08193, Catalonia, Spain. [email protected].
  9. Departament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193, Catalonia, Spain. [email protected].
  10. Unitat Mixta d'investigació IRTA-UAB en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus, Bellaterra, 08193, Catalonia, Spain. [email protected].
  11. Programa de Sanitat Animal, IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus, Bellaterra, 08193, Catalonia, Spain. [email protected].

Abstract

Human activities including deforestation, urbanization, and wildlife exploitation increase the risk of transmission of zoonotic diseases. Urban and peri-urban wildlife species often flourish in human-altered environments, with their survival and behavior heavily influenced by human-generated food and waste. In Catalonia, Spain, and other Mediterranean regions, species of rodents, including the house mouse (Mus musculus), black rat (Rattus rattus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus), as well as wild boar (Sus scrofa) are common in urban and peri-urban areas. These species host numerous infectious agents, including coronaviruses (CoVs), posing potential human health risks. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) evolved to infect previously non-susceptible species, with variants capable of infecting rodents, emphasizing their importance in surveillance studies. The present study assessed SARS-CoV-2 presence and/or exposure in 232 rodents, 313 wild boar, and 37 Vietnamese Pot-bellied pigs in Catalonia during the pandemic period (2020-2023). All the animals tested for acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (232 rodents and 29 wild boar) were negative. For SARS-CoV-2 exposure, 3 out of 313 (0.96%) wild boar tested positive by ELISA, while the remaining 32 rodents, 310 wild boar, and 37 Vietnamese Pot-bellied pigs were all negative. Cross-reactivity with other CoVs was predicted for ELISA-positive samples, as the 3 wild boar tested negative by the virus neutralization assay, considered as the gold standard technique. The absence of SARS-CoV-2 exposure or acute infection in wild boar and rodent species supports their negligible role in viral spread or transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic in Catalonia. However, their proximity to humans and the ongoing genetic evolution of SARS-CoV-2 underline the need for continued monitoring. Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in animal species can contribute to design measures to control the emergence of new animal reservoirs or intermediate hosts that could facilitate viral spillover events.

Supporting text Virus Host Location
Peri-urban species 1 Rodents, wild boar 1 SARS-CoV-2 550 Surveillance 60 Urban species 1

Evidence records

3 total
Zoonotic Surveillance
3 records · 3 evidence types
Evidence type
1 records
OVE8360
Key finding

All 232 rodents and 29 wild boar tested negative for acute SARS-CoV-2 infection in Catalonia.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

The present study assessed SARS-CoV-2 presence and/or exposure in 232 rodents, 313 wild boar, and 37 Vietnamese Pot-bellied pigs in Catalonia during the pandemic period (2020-2023). All the animals tested for acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (232 rodents and 29 wild boar) were negative.

Method
infection testing | surveillance detection of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection
Sample type
wildlife surveillance samples
Geographic raw
Catalonia
Country inferred
ESP
Evidence type
1 records
OVE8361
Key finding

Three of 313 wild boar from Catalonia showed ELISA reactivity to SARS-CoV-2, but all were negative by virus neutralization assay suggesting cross-reactivity rather than true exposure.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

For SARS-CoV-2 exposure, 3 out of 313 (0.96%) wild boar tested positive by ELISA, while the remaining ... tested negative. Cross-reactivity with other CoVs was predicted for ELISA-positive samples, as the 3 wild boar tested negative by the virus neutralization assay.

Method
ELISA | virus neutralization assay
Sample type
serum
Evidence type
1 records
OVE8362
Key finding

Wild boar and rodent species in Catalonia showed no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection or exposure, indicating minimal ecological involvement in viral circulation during the pandemic.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

The absence of SARS-CoV-2 exposure or acute infection in wild boar and rodent species supports their negligible role in viral spread or transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic in Catalonia.

Method
ELISA | virus neutralization assay | PCR testing
Sample type
blood samples | nasal swabs
Geographic raw
Catalonia
Country inferred
ESP