Literature detail

Wildlife in Cameroon harbor diverse coronaviruses, including many closely related to human coronavirus 229E.

Nkom F Ntumvi1 Valantine Ngum Ndze Amethyst Gillis2 Joseph Le Doux Diffo1 Ubald Tamoufe1 Jean-Michel Takuo1 Moctar M M Mouiche3 Julius Nwobegahay4 Matthew LeBreton Anne W Rimoin5 Bradley S Schneider2 Corina Monagin David J McIver6 Sanjit Roy7 James A Ayukekbong6 Karen E Saylors7 Damien O Joly6 Nathan D Wolfe Edward M Rubin2 Christian E Lange6
Affiliations 7 institutions
  1. Metabiota Cameroon Ltd, Yaoundé, Centre Region Avenue Mvog-Fouda Ada, Av 1.085, Carrefour Intendance, Yaoundé, BP 15939, Cameroon.
  2. Metabiota Inc, 425 California Street, Suite 1200, San Francisco, CA 94104, USA.
  3. Mosaic, Yaoundé, Centre Region, BP 35353, Cameroon.
  4. CRESAR, Yaoundé, Centre Region 7039 Carrefour Intendance, BP 15939, Cameroon.
  5. Department of Epidemiology, University of California, 71-254 Center for Health Sciences, 650 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
  6. Metabiota Inc, 7-1611 Bowen Road, Nanaimo BC V9S 1G5, Canada.
  7. Labyrinth Global Health, 546 15TH Ave NE, St.Petersburg, FL 33704, USA.
PMID 35233291 2022 Virus Evol eng epublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

Zoonotic spillover of animal viruses into human populations is a continuous and increasing public health risk. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) highlights the global impact of emergence. Considering the history and diversity of coronaviruses (CoVs), especially in bats, SARS-CoV-2 will likely not be the last to spillover from animals into human populations. We sampled and tested wildlife in the Central African country Cameroon to determine which CoVs are circulating and how they relate to previously detected human and animal CoVs. We collected animal and ecological data at sampling locations and used family-level consensus PCR combined with amplicon sequencing for virus detection. Between 2003 and 2018, samples were collected from 6,580 animals of several different orders. CoV RNA was detected in 175 bats, a civet, and a shrew. The CoV RNAs detected in the bats represented 17 different genetic clusters, coinciding with alpha (<i>n</i> = 8) and beta (<i>n</i> = 9) CoVs. Sequences resembling human CoV-229E (HCoV-229E) were found in 40 <i>Hipposideridae</i> bats. Phylogenetic analyses place the human-derived HCoV-229E isolates closest to those from camels in terms of the S and N genes but closest to isolates from bats for the envelope, membrane, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase genes. The CoV RNA positivity rate in bats varied significantly (P < 0.001) between the wet (8.2 per cent) and dry seasons (4.5 per cent). Most sampled species accordingly had a wet season high and dry season low, while for some the opposite was found. Eight of the suspected CoV species of which we detected RNA appear to be entirely novel CoV species, which suggests that CoV diversity in African wildlife is still rather poorly understood. The detection of multiple different variants of HCoV-229E-like viruses supports the bat reservoir hypothesis for this virus, with the phylogenetic results casting some doubt on camels as an intermediate host. The findings also support the previously proposed influence of ecological factors on CoV circulation, indicating a high level of underlying complexity to the viral ecology. These results indicate the importance of investing in surveillance activities among wild animals to detect all potential threats as well as sentinel surveillance among exposed humans to determine emerging threats.

bats cameroon Coronavirus HCoV-229E seasonality wildlife

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

4 total
2 records
Extraction confidence 1.00
Key finding

Surveillance of 6,580 wild animals in Cameroon detected diverse coronaviruses, including in bats, a civet, and a shrew.

Host
Location
Supporting text

We sampled and tested wildlife in the Central African country Cameroon to determine which CoVs are circulating and how they relate to previously detected human and animal CoVs. Between 2003 and 2018, samples were collected from 6,580 animals of several different orders. CoV RNA was detected in 175 bats, a civet, and a shrew.

Method
PCR; amplicon sequencing
Geographic raw
Cameroon
Country inferred
Cameroon
Extraction confidence 1.00
Key finding

Human coronavirus 229E-like sequences were detected by surveillance in 40 Hipposideridae bats in Cameroon.

Virus
Location
Supporting text

Sequences resembling human CoV-229E (HCoV-229E) were found in 40 Hipposideridae bats.

Method
PCR; amplicon sequencing
Geographic raw
Cameroon
Country inferred
Cameroon
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.95
Key finding

Phylogenetic analysis of HCoV-229E sequences showed gene-specific clustering with camel and bat isolates, suggesting complex evolutionary links and a likely bat reservoir origin.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Phylogenetic analyses place the human-derived HCoV-229E isolates closest to those from camels in terms of the S and N genes but closest to isolates from bats for the envelope, membrane, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase genes.

Genes or proteins
S; N; envelope; membrane; RNA-dependent RNA polymerase
Analysis methods
phylogenetic analysis
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.90
Key finding

Bats in Cameroon act as natural reservoirs for diverse coronaviruses, including HCoV-229E-like strains, with infection rates varying seasonally between wet and dry periods.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

CoV RNA was detected in 175 bats, a civet, and a shrew. Sequences resembling human CoV-229E (HCoV-229E) were found in 40 Hipposideridae bats. The CoV RNA positivity rate in bats varied significantly (P < 0.001) between the wet (8.2 per cent) and dry seasons (4.5 per cent). The detection of multiple different variants of HCoV-229E-like viruses supports the bat reservoir hypothesis for this virus.

Method
field sampling; PCR; amplicon sequencing
Sample type
wildlife samples
Geographic raw
Cameroon
Country inferred
Cameroon