A One Health Investigation into H5N1 Avian Influenza Virus Epizootics on Two Dairy Farms.

Ismaila Shittu1 Diego Silva1 Judith U Oguzie1 Lyudmyla V Marushchak1 Gene G Olinger2 John A Lednicky3,4 Claudia M Trujillo-Vargas1 Nicholas E Schneider5 Haiping Hao6 Gregory C Gray1,7,8,9
Affiliations 9 institutions
  1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
  2. Galveston National Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
  3. Department of Environmental and Global Health, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  4. Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  5. Schneider Veterinary Services, Milliken, Colorado, USA.
  6. Nextgen Sequencing Core, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
  7. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
  8. Institute for Human Infections and Immunity, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
  9. Department of Global Health, School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.

Abstract

In early April 2024 we studied 2 Texas dairy farms that had suffered incursions of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) the previous month. We employed molecular assays, cell and egg culture, Sanger and next generation sequencing to isolate and characterize viruses from multiple farm specimens (cow nasal swab, milk specimens, fecal slurry, and a dead bird). We detected H5N1 HPAIV in 64% (9/14) of milk specimens, 2.6% (1/39) of cattle nasal swab specimens, and none of 17 cattle worker nasopharyngeal swab specimens. We cultured and characterized virus from 8 H5N1-positive specimens. Sanger and next-generation sequencing revealed the viruses were closely related into other recent Texas epizootic H5N1 strains of clade 2.3.4.4b. Our isolates had multiple mutations associated with increased spillover potential. Surprisingly, we detected severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a nasal swab from a sick cow. Additionally, 14.3% (2/14) of the farm workers who donated sera were recently symptomatic and had elevated neutralizing antibodies against a related H5N1 strain. Although our sampling was limited, these data offer additional insight into the large H5N1 HPAIV epizootic, which has rapidly spread in the United States. Due to fears that research might damage dairy businesses, studies like this one have been few. We need to find ways to work with dairy farms in collecting more comprehensive epidemiological data that are necessary for the design of future interventions against H5N1 HPAIV on cattle farms.

Supporting text Virus Host Location
avian influenza 57 dairy cattle farm 1 dairy workers 1 epidemiology 48 influenza 61 Cattle Diseases 47 Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype 300 Influenza in Birds 341 Influenza, Human 286 One Health 14 Animals 1948 Birds 212 Cattle 126 Dairying 5 Farms 30 Feces 113 Female 289 Humans 1440 Milk 14 Phylogeny 805 SARS-CoV-2 453 Texas 14

Evidence records

5 total
Zoonotic Surveillance
4 records · 3 evidence types
Evidence type
1 records
OVE8675
Key finding

Infectious H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus was cultured and isolated from eight H5N1-positive farm specimens collected from cows and a dead bird on Texas dairy farms.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We employed molecular assays, cell and egg culture, Sanger and next generation sequencing to isolate and characterize viruses from multiple farm specimens (cow nasal swab, milk specimens, fecal slurry, and a dead bird). We cultured and characterized virus from 8 H5N1-positive specimens.

Sample type
nasal swab | milk specimens | fecal slurry
Evidence type
2 records
OVE8676
Key finding

H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus RNA was detected in milk and nasal swab specimens from dairy cattle in Texas.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

In early April 2024 we studied 2 Texas dairy farms that had suffered incursions of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) the previous month. We detected H5N1 HPAIV in 64% (9/14) of milk specimens, 2.6% (1/39) of cattle nasal swab specimens, and none of 17 cattle worker nasopharyngeal swab specimens.

Method
molecular assays
Sample type
milk specimens | cattle nasal swab specimens
Geographic raw
Texas
Country inferred
USA
OVE8677
Key finding

SARS-CoV-2 was detected in a nasal swab from a sick cow in Texas.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

In early April 2024 we studied 2 Texas dairy farms that had suffered incursions of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) the previous month. Surprisingly, we detected severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a nasal swab from a sick cow.

Method
molecular assay
Sample type
nasal swab
Geographic raw
Texas
Country inferred
USA
Evidence type
1 records
OVE8680
Key finding

14.3% of farm workers had elevated neutralizing antibodies indicating serologic exposure to a related H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza strain.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

14.3% (2/14) of the farm workers who donated sera were recently symptomatic and had elevated neutralizing antibodies against a related H5N1 strain.

Method
neutralization assay
Sample type
sera
Genomic Evolution
1 records · 1 evidence types
Evidence type
1 records
OVE8678
Key finding

Sequencing indicated that H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus isolates from Texas dairy farms were closely related to other recent Texas epizootic H5N1 strains of clade 2.3.4.4b.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

We employed molecular assays, cell and egg culture, Sanger and next generation sequencing to isolate and characterize viruses from multiple farm specimens (cow nasal swab, milk specimens, fecal slurry, and a dead bird). Sanger and next-generation sequencing revealed the viruses were closely related into other recent Texas epizootic H5N1 strains of clade 2.3.4.4b.

Analysis methods
Sanger sequencing | next generation sequencing | phylogenetic relatedness assessment