Exploration of risk factors contributing to the presence of influenza A virus in swine at agricultural fairs.

Andrew S Bowman1 Jeffrey D Workman2,3 Jacqueline M Nolting1 Sarah W Nelson1 Richard D Slemons1
Affiliations 3 institutions
  1. Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
  2. Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43210, USA
  3. Ohio State University Extension, The Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Abstract

Influenza A virus infections occurring in exhibition swine populations at agricultural fairs during 2012 served as a source of H3N2 variant influenza A viruses transmitted to humans resulting in more than 300 documented cases. Prior to the outbreak, this investigation was initiated to identify fair-level risk factors contributing to influenza A virus infections in pigs at agricultural fairs. As part of an ongoing active surveillance program, nasal swabs and associated fair-level metadata were collected from pigs at 40 junior fair market swine shows held in Ohio during the 2012 fair season. Analyses of the data show that the adjusted odds of having influenza A virus-infected pigs at a fair were 1.27 (95% confidential interval (CI): 1.04-1.66) higher for every 20 pig increase in the size of the swine show. Additionally, four of the five fairs that hosted breeding swine shows in addition to their junior fair market swine shows had pigs test positive for influenza A virus. While the current study was limited to 40 fairs within one state, the findings provided insight for veterinary and public health officials developing mitigation strategies to decrease the intra- and inter-species transmission of influenza A virus at fairs.

Supporting text Virus Host Location
H3N2v 1 influenza 61 swine 267 zoonotic disease 19

Evidence records

3 total
Zoonotic Surveillance
2 records · 2 evidence types
Evidence type
1 records
OVE2066
Key finding

Influenza A virus was detected in pigs sampled at agricultural fairs in Ohio during the 2012 fair season through nasal swab surveillance.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

As part of an ongoing active surveillance program, nasal swabs and associated fair-level metadata were collected from pigs at 40 junior fair market swine shows held in Ohio during the 2012 fair season.

Method
active surveillance program | nasal swab sampling
Sample type
nasal swabs
Geographic raw
Ohio
Country inferred
USA
Evidence type
1 records
OVE2067
Key finding

Larger agricultural fairs and breeding swine shows in Ohio had higher odds of pigs being infected with influenza A virus, indicating ecological conditions that favor viral circulation among exhibition swine.

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

As part of an ongoing active surveillance program, nasal swabs and associated fair-level metadata were collected from pigs at 40 junior fair market swine shows held in Ohio during the 2012 fair season. Analyses of the data show that the adjusted odds of having influenza A virus-infected pigs at a fair were 1.27 (95% confidential interval (CI): 1.04-1.66) higher for every 20 pig increase in the size of the swine show. Additionally, four of the five fairs that hosted breeding swine shows in addition to their junior fair market swine shows had pigs test positive for influenza A virus.

Method
risk factor analysis | active surveillance
Sample type
nasal swabs
Geographic raw
Ohio
Country inferred
USA
Transmission Evidence
1 records · 1 evidence types
Evidence type
1 records
OVE2065
Key finding

H3N2 variant influenza A viruses were transmitted from exhibition swine to humans during agricultural fair outbreaks in 2012, causing more than 300 documented human cases.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Influenza A virus infections occurring in exhibition swine populations at agricultural fairs during 2012 served as a source of H3N2 variant influenza A viruses transmitted to humans resulting in more than 300 documented cases.

Method
active surveillance | nasal swabs
Study design
active surveillance and outbreak investigation
Transmission direction
animal-to-human