SARS-CoV-2 wildlife surveillance in Ontario and Québec.

Janet E Greenhorn1 Jonathon D Kotwa2 Jeff Bowman1 Laura Bruce1 Tore Buchanan1 Peter A Buck3 Christina M Davy4 Antonia Dibernardo5 Logan Flockhart3 Marianne Gagnier6 Aaron Hou2 Claire M Jardine7 Stephane Lair8 L Robbin Lindsay5 Ariane Massé6 Pia K Muchaal3 Larissa A Nituch1 Angelo Sotto2 Brian Stevens7 Lily Yip2 Samira Mubareka2,9
Affiliations 9 institutions
  1. Wildlife Research and Monitoring Section, Ontario Ministry of Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, ON.
  2. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON.
  3. Centre for Food-borne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada.
  4. Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON.
  5. National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB.
  6. Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec, Québec, QC.
  7. Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative, Ontario-Nunavut, Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON.
  8. Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative, Québec, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC.
  9. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, is capable of infecting a variety of wildlife species. Wildlife living in close contact with humans are at an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure and, if infected, have the potential to become a reservoir for the pathogen, making control and management more difficult. The objective of this study is to conduct SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in urban wildlife from Ontario and Québec, increasing our knowledge of the epidemiology of the virus and our chances of detecting spillover from humans into wildlife. Using a One Health approach, we leveraged activities of existing research, surveillance and rehabilitation programs among multiple agencies to collect samples from 776 animals from 17 different wildlife species between June 2020 and May 2021. Samples from all animals were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral ribonucleic acid, and a subset of samples from 219 animals across three species (raccoons, Procyon lotor; striped skunks, Mephitis mephitis; and mink, Neovison vison) were also tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies. No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 viral ribonucleic acid or neutralizing antibodies was detected in any of the tested samples. Although we were unable to identify positive SARS-CoV-2 cases in wildlife, continued research and surveillance activities are critical to better understand the rapidly changing landscape of susceptible animal species. Collaboration between academic, public and animal health sectors should include experts from relevant fields to build coordinated surveillance and response capacity.

Supporting text Virus Host Location
Ontario 3 Québec 0 SARS-CoV-2 550 surveillance 60 wildlife 48

Evidence records

2 total
Zoonotic Surveillance
2 records · 2 evidence types
Evidence type
1 records
OVE7086
Key finding

SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in urban wildlife from Ontario and Québec, including raccoons (Procyon lotor), striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), and mink (Neovison vison).

Virus
Host
Location
Supporting text

The objective of this study is to conduct SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in urban wildlife from Ontario and Québec. Samples from all animals were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral ribonucleic acid, and a subset of samples from 219 animals across three species (raccoons, Procyon lotor; striped skunks, Mephitis mephitis; and mink, Neovison vison) were also tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies. No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 viral ribonucleic acid or neutralizing antibodies was detected in any of the tested samples.

Method
testing for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral ribonucleic acid
Sample type
samples
Geographic raw
Ontario | Québec
Country inferred
CAN
Evidence type
1 records
OVE7087
Key finding

No neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were detected in raccoons, striped skunks, or mink sampled in Ontario and Québec.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Samples from all animals were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral ribonucleic acid, and a subset of samples from 219 animals across three species (raccoons, Procyon lotor; striped skunks, Mephitis mephitis; and mink, Neovison vison) were also tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies. No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 viral ribonucleic acid or neutralizing antibodies was detected in any of the tested samples.

Method
neutralizing antibody test
Sample type
serum samples