Literature detail

Cross-Species Surveillance of Respiratory Viruses in Domestic and Wild Mammals of an Urban Atlantic Forest from Brazil.

Leonardo Corrêa da Silva Junior1 Deborah Fernandes Wailante1 Marina Galvao Bueno2 Patricia Emilia Bento Moura2 Alex Pauvolid-Corrêa3 Roberto Leonan Morim Novaes4 Sócrates Fraga da Costa-Neto4 Iuri Veríssimo4 Natasha Avila Bertocchi4 Ricardo Moratelli4 Rosana Gentile5 Fernando Couto Motta1 Mia Ferreira de Araújo1 David Brown1 Paola Cristina Resende1 Marilda Agudo Mendonça Teixeira de Siqueira1 Maria Ogrzewalska6
Affiliations 6 institutions
  1. Laboratório de Vírus Respiratórios, Exantemáticos, Enterovírus e Emergências Virais, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, IOC, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-900, Brazil.
  2. Laboratório de Virologia Comparada e Ambiental, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, IOC, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-900, Brazil.
  3. Laboratório de Virologia Veterinária de Viçosa, Departamento de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570-900, Brazil.
  4. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz Mata Atlântica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22713-570, Brazil.
  5. Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, IOC, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-360, Brazil.
  6. Laboratório de Vírus Respiratórios, Exantemáticos, Enterovírus e Emergências Virais, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, IOC, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-900, Brazil. [email protected].
PMID 39904935 2025 Ecohealth eng ppublish
PubMed DOI Browse context

Article

Publication summary

Our aim was to investigate respiratory viruses circulating in animals from the urban Atlantic Forest, which is located in the most densely populated area near Rio de Janeiro in Brazil. This study focused on the detection of Influenza A viruses and diverse coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2, in domestic and wild animals, including bats, nonhuman primates, rodents, and marsupials. From August 2020 to September 2022, biological samples were collected from a total of 72 pets, 66 primates, 20 rodents, 36 marsupials, and 390 bats. Samples were tested using RT-PCR for Influenza A and coronaviruses, and positive samples were sequenced. When blood samples were available, they were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. All terrestrial animals were negative for evidence of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A viruses. However, samples from 17 phyllostomid bats, including Great fruit-eating bat (Artibeus lituratus), Silky short-tailed bat (Carollia brevicauda), Seba's short-tailed bat (Carollia perspicillata), Common big-eared bat (Micronycteris microtis), Greater spear-nosed bat (Phyllostomus hastatus), White-lined broad-nosed bat (Platyrrhinus lineatus), Little yellow-shouldered bat (Sturnira lilium), Greater round-eared bat (Tonatia bidens), and Common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus), were positive for bat coronaviruses classified as Alphacoronavirus. Our study adds new information on the occurrence of coronaviruses in bats and contributes to a long-term program of Influenza surveillance. Developing active surveillance for viruses in wildlife species, as implemented in this study, is crucial for understanding zoonotic risks and preventing future global pandemics.

One health Respiratory viruses South America Wildlife Zoonosis Animals, Domestic Animals, Wild Mammals Animals Brazil Chiroptera COVID-19 Forests Influenza A virus SARS-CoV-2

Structured evidence records

Evidence records

3 total
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.75
Key finding

Sequenced bat coronavirus samples from 17 phyllostomid bats were classified as Alphacoronavirus, indicating genomic characterization of bat coronaviruses in Brazil.

Location
Not specified
Supporting text

Samples were tested using RT-PCR for Influenza A and coronaviruses, and positive samples were sequenced. ... samples from 17 phyllostomid bats ... were positive for bat coronaviruses classified as Alphacoronavirus.

Genes or proteins
whole genome
Analysis methods
RT-PCR; sequencing; viral classification
1 records
Extraction confidence 0.90
Key finding

Serological testing of blood samples from domestic and wild mammals in Brazil found no antibodies indicating SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Virus
Host
Location
Not specified
Supporting text

When blood samples were available, they were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. All terrestrial animals were negative for evidence of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A viruses.

Sample type
blood
1 records
Extraction confidence 1.00
Key finding

Phyllostomid bats sampled in an urban Atlantic Forest in Brazil tested positive for Alphacoronaviruses, indicating active viral circulation detected through wildlife surveillance.

Location
Supporting text

Samples from 17 phyllostomid bats, including Great fruit-eating bat (Artibeus lituratus), Silky short-tailed bat (Carollia brevicauda), Seba's short-tailed bat (Carollia perspicillata), Common big-eared bat (Micronycteris microtis), Greater spear-nosed bat (Phyllostomus hastatus), White-lined broad-nosed bat (Platyrrhinus lineatus), Little yellow-shouldered bat (Sturnira lilium), Greater round-eared bat (Tonatia bidens), and Common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus), were positive for bat coronaviruses classified as Alphacoronavirus.

Method
RT-PCR; sequencing
Sample type
biological samples
Geographic raw
urban Atlantic Forest near Rio de Janeiro
Country inferred
Brazil